Lal

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,016 through 3,030 (of 4,312 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Copenhagen interpretation #26823
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Yes. There are all these weird speculations.

    They all arise because people are trying to extrapolate some “unusual characteristics” of very small particles (quantum particles) to “large particles” that we are familiar with.

    For example, when one shoots quantum particles like electrons through a “double-slit”, the electrons going through those slits fall on “unexpected positions” on a screen placed beyond the double-slit. See, #7 of “The Double Slit Experiment – Correlation between Mind and Matter?
    – However, if you make a large double-slit for tennis balls and shoot tennis balls, they will NOT make such a weird pattern.

    The scenarios that you describe are the same. Such phenomena have been OBSERVED only in the microscopic realm, i.e., for quantum particles like electrons and photons and in a few cases to small molecules.
    – But people try to extrapolate such observations to the macroscopic realm (i.e., objects like tennis balls, cats, the Moon, and humans.

    in reply to: Determining if I have reached the Sōtapannaa stage #26809
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Sybe07: Sakkaya ditthi is a (wrong) VIEW.

    When one gets rid of sakkaya ditthi, one just gets rid of that wrong view. That does not mean one will lose any of the five aggregates.

    One will then realize that IT IS UNFRUITFUL to take any of those as “MINE.”
    – But one may still have the PERCEPTION (sanna) that those are “mine.” That perception reduces at each stage of magga phala and will COMPLETELY go away only at the Arahant stage.

    P.S. The recent post, “Mental Body Versus the Physical Body” discusses why it is unfruitful to take one’s body to be “mine.”

    in reply to: Determining if I have reached the Sōtapannaa stage #26781
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Those are Johnny’s comments, Siebe.

    Johnny wrote: “But unless we are faced with extreme difficulties under very trying conditions, we cannot for sure know that we have attained any magga phala.”

    That is quite true.
    – However, if one has truly attained a magga phala, no external circumstance will dictate one’s moral behavior limits set by THAT PARTICULAR magga phala.

    It is only an Arahant who WILL NOT, under any circumstance, commit any akusala.

    A Sotapanna, for example, is NOT CAPABLE of doing only six types of extreme akusala: killing father, killing mother, killing an Arahant, injuring a Buddha, stop following the path of the Buddha. The other one, I think is Sangha Bheda (schism in Sangha), but that is applicable only to bhikkhus.
    P.S. However, that DOES NOT mean that a Sotapanna WILL DO any other akusala deeds. Those are just the ones a Sotapanna WILL NOT DO, under any circumstance.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Determining if I have reached the Sōtapannaa stage #26779
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Johnny_Lim posted the following.

    Came across an article – Nine Meals from Anarchy

    Inside the article, 2 things are worth mentioning:

    1.After only nine missed meals, it’s not unlikely that we’d panic and be prepared to commit a crime to acquire food. If we were to see our neighbour with a loaf of bread, and we owned a gun, we might well say, “I’m sorry, you’re a good neighbour and we’ve been friends for years, but my children haven’t eaten today – I have to have that bread – even if I have to shoot you.”

    2.Fear of starvation is fundamentally different from other fears of shortages. Even good people panic.

    It became clear to me that we as buddhists, might sometimes think we have attained this stage of ariyanhood, that stage of ariyanhood. But unless we are faced with extreme difficulties under very trying conditions, we cannot for sure know that we have attained any magga phala.

    The recent Wuhan coronavirus has rocked HongKong very badly. Many supermarkets are empty because the hongkongers panic-buy everything off the shelves. If the crisis continues to worsen into an anarchy, would a Sotāpanna bend on his/her morality?

    It also serves as a big reminder to me that a person cannot have a never-changing self. Circumstances can change a person’s behaviour. Only Dhamma is our refuge.

    in reply to: Descent of Gandhabba Into Womb #26764
    Lal
    Keymaster

    One cannot ever KNOW everything, unless of course, one is a Sammasambuddha.

    However, one can make logical conclusions based on what one understands. When one starts understanding the depth of Buddha’s teachings, and the self-consistency, one will start building confidence that a Buddha is a unique human who is born only after long times. That is called building saddha!

    One cannot force oneself to have saddha. It comes through UNDERSTANDING. It comes through SELF-CONSISTENCY in the teachings. It comes through one’s own EXPERIENCE in seeing that one’s level of greed, anger, and ignorance diminish with time.
    – In fact, it is the last one that is the most important (one’s own EXPERIENCE).

    Let me just give a simple example. None of us has been to all the countries on Earth. But do any one of us doubt that any of those countries does not exist?
    – How do we know that any given country exists, even if we have no first-hand experience? We know that because there is ample indirect evidence (all self-consistent) for its existence.

    Anyway, enough on this topic.
    – Just keep in mind that it is dangerous to make derogatory statements regarding a Buddha. There is no need to. It will only serve to block one’s progress. It is OK to have doubts. It is fine to keep an open mind. But making such unnecessary statements can only be harmful to oneself.

    in reply to: Language and communication #26758
    Lal
    Keymaster

    I know that I can only get an impression of what they are saying in a dream. It is not an opinion.

    How would it be possible to hear words? There is no sound coming through the ears!

    Anyway, there is no point in arguing about it. If you THINK that you are hearing actual words, that is fine with me. I am just saying it cannot possibly happen. It is the mind that “sees” and “hears” in a dream (your eyes are definitely closed).

    in reply to: Descent of Gandhabba Into Womb #26752
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Very good summary, y not.

    in reply to: post on Boy Who Remembered Pāli Suttas for 1500 Years #26751
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Johnny: Yes. Nama gotta (or memory records) can be accessed by either punna iddhi or by cultivating jhana.

    Recalling previous lives by punna iddhi means, due to a past kamma they are able to recall. Children recalling past lives can be thought to fall under that too. Some others can recall memories in this life in great detail: “Recent Evidence for Unbroken Memory Records (HSAM)

    Those who cultivate the fourth jhana may be able to recall many past lives. Even before the Buddha, there were yogis who could recall many past lives. But those are mainly past human lives.
    – A few are able to recall many, many past lives including those in different bhava. A Buddha can recall as many of those at a great speed.

    Tobias asked: “Are stupas closed chambers so that no human can go inside?”

    Yes. A stupa is a huge structure. Dhatu are stored in a small chamber inside. But it is fully closed. No human can go inside. The following are pictures of Stupas:
    Pictures of Stupa.”

    in reply to: post on Boy Who Remembered Pāli Suttas for 1500 Years #26737
    Lal
    Keymaster

    I watched the video. It is a three-year-old girl from Sri Lanka.

    This account is interesting because the girl talks about past birth in a different realm, i.e., different bhava. That is very unusual.
    – Most rebirth accounts are from past births in the human realm.
    – Normally, memories from different bhava (or realms) cannot be recalled. But some with punna iddhi can do that. Some petas can do that too. That is part of their suffering. They will know exactly why they are born as a peta (hungry ghost.)

    Some highlights:

    – Both male and female Devas wear colorful clothes and jewelry.
    – They apparently have different types of food, drinks, and flowers. We need to remember that those cannot be compared to ours. Don’t think in terms of our food, drinks, flowers, jewelry, etc.
    – There are devas with lower and higher levels. I had read that in the suttas too. Some have more powers than others (as a result of better kamma vipaka.)

    More interestingly, she gave some accounts of things that happened in the human realm. She says there are no bhikkhus or temples in the Deva realm. She and others “came down” to worship the Buddha and religious sites.
    – There were no stupas before the Parinibbana of the Buddha. After Buddha’s Parinibbana, stupas were built. As a Deva, she was able to “go inside” stupas and see those dhatu (remains of the Buddha) enclosed in golden containers.
    – She also says the Buddha statues we have today do not match the features of the Buddha. That makes sense. Statues of the Buddha were built hundreds of years after the Parinibbana of the Buddha. There were Buddhist Greek Kings in India after Alexander. That is when the tradition to build Buddha statues started (Greeks are famous for making statues.) P.S. At 8.30 minutes she says that there were no Buddha statues while she was a Deva. Apparently she must have died there within a couple of hundred years after the Parinibbana of the Buddha.
    – There was another interesting account regarding the death of Ven. Moggallana. He was killed by a group of people. The King caught them, buried them to their waist and had elephants kill them. That account is in the Tipitaka. She apparently remembers that incident. She did not describe what happened in detail like that. Just said the King killed those who were responsible.

    in reply to: Descent of Gandhabba Into Womb #26736
    Lal
    Keymaster

    A “descending gandhabba” just means a gandhabba entering a womb. I am not sure why it is stated as “descending.”

    You wrote: ” So maybe the Buddha copied this idea of the Brahmins.”

    That means you have no idea who a Buddha is. A Buddha does not need to “copy” anything from anyone.

    You can believe or not believe anything. That is totally up to you. But refrain from making derogatory comments. Just ask a (sensible) question if you like.

    in reply to: Descent of Gandhabba Into Womb #26734
    Lal
    Keymaster

    I have not seen a time period in the Tipitaka, Siebe.

    However, according to science, it happens within a day or two.

    in reply to: Language and communication #26715
    Lal
    Keymaster

    “idea must be translated to language for him to understand.”

    No. That is not correct.

    As I pointed out, Brahmas do not have languages. How can they learn languages if they cannot speak? They just grasp the idea with the mind.
    – We also grasp the idea when we hear in our dreams. There is no language involved.

    in reply to: Arahant and 10 tathagata power #26714
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Only a Sammasambuddha (like Buddha Gotama) has those capabilities to the fullest extent.

    All others may have some of them to some extent.

    in reply to: Language and communication #26710
    Lal
    Keymaster

    The way beings in different realms communicate does not involve a language.

    When we speak, in addition to the sound coming out, our thoughts “emit” the idea to the external world too. That idea can be grasped by those beings.

    That is how we “hear” in dreams. While we dream we can hear those in the dream say. But we don’t hear anything through our ears.

    I think you can get the basic idea by thinking about the following.

    Consider someone who knows two (or more) languages well. When that person dreams, he does not hear with one of those languages. He just understands what someone in the dream says.

    Another point is that Brahmas in Brahma realms do not have dense bodies like ours. They cannot “speak” as we do. They hear in the above way, just with their thoughts. They don’t have languages.

    This was discussed in the post published today, with references to previous posts: “Mental Body Versus the Physical Body.”

    in reply to: Kamma and Intention #26682
    Lal
    Keymaster

    All good comments. It is good to think deeply about these issues.

    But it is also clear that we can make decisions only based on our current status of understanding. Thus it is essential to keep learning and gradually remove all our wrong views. All wrong views are removed only at the Arahant stage.
    – The grandmother made bad decisions because her level of ignorance was high.
    – In case 2, person A may inform person B without thinking clearly about the possible bad consequences. Sometimes it is better NOT to do anything.

    That last statement applies to speech often. It is better NOT to say things EVEN IF true if that is not the right place to say it. See, “Right Speech – How to Avoid Accumulating Kamma.”

    Furthermore, we must always be mindful of our actions and speech. But it is also CRITICAL to be mindful of our THOUGHTS. As we have been discussing in the recent posts on “Origin of Life,” it is in our thoughts (specifically in javana citta) that we create kammic energies.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,016 through 3,030 (of 4,312 total)