Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
#44834
“Viññāṇa Dhātu includes Records With and Without Kammic Energy”
To put this in terms of the five aggregates, is it correct to say that:
Records without kammic energy are mere pañcakkhandhā and with kammic energy are pañcupādānakkhandhā?
Best,
LangI thought of a wording that helps me personally understand this better:
“Manāyatana or any other āyatana works the same way. Sensory faculties LEAD TO āyatana for average humans, but not for Arahants.”.
(replacing BECOME with “LEAD TO”)
If this kind of phrasing makes sense to others, there are other synonyms of “lead to” that can be used:
bring, bring on, produce, generate, etc.
Also, using the example of someone watching an X-rated movie, I have another thought: āyatanā come in clusters.
First, the “pleasure” really takes place in the mind, so we have manāyatana and cakkhayatana happening together.
In this kind of movie, there are also sounds to illustrate the passion. Thus there are likely cakkhayatana, sotayatana, and manāyatana happening in the viewer.
2 users thanked author for this post.
My guess is that the experience of an arahant can still be described by the same verse:
“cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṁ“, because:
(1) For a living arahant, there is still a cakku pasada rupa and a hadaya vatthu.
(2) Elsewhere Lal has explained that paticca in this context is “coming together” — not the same as “pati + icca” as in paticca samuppada. Thus, for an arahant, there is still paticca in this sense.
We know that cakkhuviññāṇaṁ for an arahant is pure and vastly different from that of ours; it’s just not fathomable to us. If someone can make up a special term to describe that to help him understand better then it’s all good (perhaps something like “cakkhuñāṇaṁ” (without the “vi“)).
Anyhow, it is much easier to draw the distinction between an arahant and us in the subsequent verse: there is NO “tiṇṇaṁ saṅgati phasso” for arahants, but there is for us. And this point can serve us better in terms of practice — to work to reduce “san“.
Best,
Lang
Kusala-Mula PS is directed toward Nibbana. In this context, can chanda — as in Satara Iddhipada — be another substitute for upadana?
My mind has been strongly conditioned to link tanha and upadana to Akusala-Mula PS. We now learn that they are neutral words, but it will take time to shake that off.
Thank you.
LangUntil then, humans see the cultivation of (abhi)saṅkhāra as “pleasure”.
Is this “pleasure” also described by the word Assāda, as in Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana?
Fascinating thread with much insight. Thank you!
“Arahants don’t have vexation, that is why they don’t feel pleasure.”
To be more precise, we can say that arahants don’t feel mental pleasure (somanassa vedana). They still feel sukkha vedana (and also dukha vedana, but NO domanassa vedana as you pointed out).
A question about something totally unrelated: if we get a chance to take care of an arahant, to help make his/her physical life as comfortable as possible, then it is of tremendous merits for us, correct?
Lang
1 user thanked author for this post.
“Please let me know if anyone has seen him refer to various types of anusaya and abhisankhara. I need to review them to see if there are any explanations of those terms.”
I can confirm a couple of things at this point:
(1) There are no reference to anusaya and abhisankhara in the discourses from a 10-day course.
That said, there are longer courses in this tradition: 20-day, 30-day, 45-day, 60-day.
I don’t know if there are discourses in those longer courses. I do know for sure that the technique remains the same: scanning bodily sensations from head to toes.
(2) Many practitioners in this tradition do believe that this practice alone leads to wisdom, that book knowledge is not necessary.
Again, that said, there is a 7-day course that discussed the Satipatthana Sutta. Those who have gone through three 10-day courses can take this course.
I just saw that the discourses for that course are also online:
SN Goenka Mahasatipatthana Sutta Discourse (ENGLISH)
The book used in this course has Pali / English side by side, and the English part is a word-for-word translation.
It has been too long since I took that course. I will need to re-listen here and there, but I do remember the impression I had at that time: that he interpreted the Satipattana Sutta in a way to fit this technique, not the other way around.
Finally, this tradition is not about breath meditation, but it does play an important role. Breath meditation is used to “sharpen” the mind so that the mind can observe subtler “realities”, meaning bodily sensations. For a 10-day course, the first 3 days are spent on breath meditation. For a 20-day course, I heard that the first 10 days were spent on breath meditation. Furthermore, they take breath meditation to be anapanasati.
Lal wrote:
If you have a (preferably short) video on his description of “sankhara,” please post it so that we can get an idea of what he really means.For those who have taken the 10-day courses in this tradition, the following nightly discourses should be familiar.
These are definitely not short, but I’ll point out a few segments which should be sufficient to get what is meant by sankhara in this technique. I know that when we pick and choose like this then then we are taking things out of context, but you do have the full discourses if you’d like to listen to all of them.
— Day 4:
10 Day Vipassana Course – Day 4 (English)
53:00 “The whole technique is to divide …”
Day 4 is the day one starts on “vipassana“. From about 53:00 on he described the technique of dividing and dissecting bodily sensations, similar to what Jorg pointed out:
“He or she would be able to reduce the coarseness of the sensations, resulting in more subtle sensations that feel more pleasant. This would also result in a reduced feeling of anger”.
He also introduced sankhara here, as mental reaction to different types of physical sensations.
— Day 5:
The first part of this day is again about dividing and dissecting sensations.
15:00 : he introduced the noble truths, as related to this techniqueStarting around 39:00, he talked about paticca samuppada, starting with tanha
39:00 : tanha
42:00 : sankhara, avijja
47:00 : where in the chain to break — vedana
48:00 : anicca as the arising and passing away of sensations
59:00 : sankhara
1:00:00 : What full liberation is like, why sensations are the key— Day 6
21:00 : sankhara as related to the kalapas; 4 types of “food,” two of which are mental: sankhara old and new
key to the technique: stop generating new sankhara (by not reacting to sensations with craving or aversion); then old sankhara arise and pass away.
Full liberation happens when all old sankhara are gone.Best!
In
Conditions for the Four Stages of Nibbāna
Can we add tanha as another way to characterize the stages of nibbana: kāma tanhā, bhava hanhā, vibhava tanhā.
vibhava tanhā is removed at the sōtapanna stage.
kāma tanhā is weakened at the sakadāgāmi stage and removed at the anāgāmi stage.
bhava tanhā is removed at the arahant stage.
“Since then, I’ve been feeling much more disenchanted about worldly things”.
However much longer you have to go, you are definitely going in the right direction. I’d venture to speculate that you are going through nibbidā, which leads to virāgā, and then to nirodhā.
Best!
1 user thanked author for this post.
Thank you, Lal.
About formatting, the only formatting I’ve done so far is to italicize Pali words, which works fine per the instruction.
I posted last night, after a long absence, and wonder if the following is happening with anybody:
I wrote my post in Notepad and pasted it to the forum, italicizing here and there.
Everything looked good before I submitted.
Once I submitted, I saw line break formatting tags: “<br />” or something like it.
I edited the post and removed them manually, but that did not work.Let’s see if that is happening with this post.
Looks like it does, and there is no formatting of any words here, so it looks like the copying and pasting caused this.
I practiced the Goenka’s technique a number of years, and found it to be quite an oversimplification (and at times misrepresentation) of Buddha Dhamma. The benefits, as you pointed out, are the temporary relief one gets after attending a retreat.
First, the verse you quoted:
All saṅkhāras are impermanent.
When you perceive this with true insight
then you become detached from suffering;
this is the path of purification.… is the translation of the Pali verse:
“Sabbe saṅkhārā aniccā” ti,
yadā paññāya passati;
Atha nibbindati dukkhe,
esa maggo visuddhiyā.”…which is Dhammapada 277 and is explained in:
Anuloma Khanti and Sammattaniyāma – Pre-requisites for a Sotapanna
(See #7)
This post is about Anuloma Khanti and Sammattaniyāma.
At the start of the thread, you wrote:
“…Another thought strongly came to mind, “Nibbana is the only way out.””
It sounds like you may have realized Sammattaniyāma, and if that is the case then it is great!
The oversimplification is that the method focuses on just bodily sensations: dukha vedana, sukha vedana, adukhamasukha vedana. It is explained that these sensations are manifestations of all mental phenomena, especially sankharā.
Very briefly, the “vipassana” part of this technique involves moving attention from head to toes, noticing the sensation in each part of the body, and observing that sensation with a mindset of equanimity. (The “anapana” part of the technique is taken to be breath meditation).
For those who are following this method, and this is all you do, then do not be surprised that after years and years of practice your gati seems to stay the same.
Best,
Lang“The message here is that our bodies are a collection of parts. Furthermore, such a body is subject to many ailments.
– It is of no benefit to making such bodies in future lives.”The body is, among other things, a means through which nature imparts kamma vipaka, some of which can be severe ailments as Lal pointed out.
See #17 in:
Body Types in 31 Realms – Importance of Manomaya Kaya
Lang
Hi. A follow-up question on “Prerequisites for the Satipaṭṭhāna Bhāvanā” mentioned above (#40216)
We have the verse: “Idha, bhikkhavē, bhikkhu aranna gatō vā rukkhamūla gatō vā sunnāgāra gatō vā nisidati pallankaṃ ābhujitvā, ujuṃ kāyaṃ paṇidhāya, parimukhaṃ satiṃ upaṭṭhapetvā“.
… which in the deeper meaning is about getting to certain mindsets, not merely “going to the forest, to the foot of a tree …”
Regarding the words “gatō vā“, is gatō related to gati?
For us, the deeper meaning here makes total sense. I was having a discussion about this sutta with someone who took only the mundane, conventional meaning. To this person, this deeper interpretation was a “stretch”.
Thank you,
LangThank you for your inputs.
First, a word about mundane dark things that may be happening in the world of the elite, those with ultra wealth and power. If that is the case then it shows the danger of ignorance of Buddha Dhamma on the mundane level, not knowing the consequences of actions, which may happen future lives.
Also, about guiding others (and in my case just one person), I notice something: this person appreciates the Pali words after understanding their meanings.
After establishing concepts of the big picture (the complex world of 31 realms with a rebirth process) and the mundane path (moral living, avoiding the 10 types of miccha ditthi), a person does appreciate learning Buddha Dhamma with Pali words after they grasp the meanings behind them. They may also come up with analogies of their own when learning key concepts.
Just a thought for someone who may be guiding others using the PD site.
