cubibobi

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 227 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • cubibobi
    Participant

    “To emphasize, only the four mental components are preserved in the nāma loka. The rupa loka has only “material things”, Thus, rupakkhandha is NOT preserved.”

    —–

    An analogy from the IT field may be helpful here. Imagine a database system that works like this:

    (1) A user creates a piece of data at time T1.

    (2) The system records not the data itself but instruction on how to create that data; let’s say that the instruction consists of four pieces of information.

    (3) At a later time T2 the user wants to retrieve that piece of data; the system goes to the instruction at timestamp T1, executes it per the four pieces of information, creates the data, and presents it to the user.

    (4) There are no limits to the storage of the instructions.

    Thus, the data itself (rupakkhandha) is NOT preserved; what is preserved is the 4-piece instruction (the four mental components) to recreate that data.

    I said to imagine such a storage system, but actually there is a database system that works somewhat like this.

    Best,
    Lang

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    cubibobi
    Participant

    “P.S. Taṇhā happens automatically due to “bad gati.” We have control over “upādāna” because that is when we become aware of the “attachment.” Thus, if we are mindful, we can realize we have started cultivating abhisankhara and stop it. That is the basis of Ananapasati/Satipatthana!”

    Thank you for reminding us of this, i.e. control over upadana. And you emphasized it again in the newest post Anuseti – How Anusaya Grows with Saṅkhāra

    #8
    Thus, we must stop the process of “anuseti” (cultivating abhisaṅkhāra) as soon as realizing attachment to an ārammaṇa. This is the basis of Ānāpānasati/Satipaṭṭhāna.

    A number of vipassana/satipatthana retreats out there teach people to focus on the “vedana paccaya tanha” step, the most typical of which is the “vipassana” as taught by S.N. Goenka. This tradition teaches people to scan the body for physical vedana to stop tanha for them.

    Thus, they are scanning the wrong things. Instead we should be “scanning” for abhisaṅkhāra, stopping apuññabhisaṅkhāra (at least at the beginning) as soon as we catch them.

    Without being exposed to true Dhamma I would still have been doing anapana as breath meditation and vipassana/satipatthana as above.

    cubibobi
    Participant

    Thank you, Lal.

    I was thinking that past pañcakkhandhā is namagotta, and that the upadana part was what created kammic energy.

    So, upadana creates new kammic energy. For an arahant, there is no new kammic energy, but there is still past kammic energy.

    cubibobi
    Participant

    #44834

    “Viññāṇa Dhātu includes Records With and Without Kammic Energy”

    To put this in terms of the five aggregates, is it correct to say that:

    Records without kammic energy are mere pañcakkhandhā and with kammic energy are pañcupādānakkhandhā?

    Best,
    Lang

    in reply to: Post on “Salāyatana Are Not Sense Faculties” #44745
    cubibobi
    Participant

    I thought of a wording that helps me personally understand this better:

    Manāyatana or any other āyatana works the same way. Sensory faculties LEAD TO āyatana for average humans, but not for Arahants.”.

    (replacing BECOME with “LEAD TO”)

     

    If this kind of phrasing makes sense to others, there are other synonyms of “lead to” that can be used:

    bring, bring on, produce, generate, etc.

     

    Also, using the example of someone watching an X-rated movie, I have another thought: āyatanā come in clusters.

    First, the “pleasure” really takes place in the mind, so we have manāyatana and cakkhayatana happening together.

    In this kind of movie, there are also sounds to illustrate the passion. Thus there are likely cakkhayatana, sotayatana, and manāyatana happening in the viewer.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Post on “Salāyatana Are Not Sense Faculties” #44735
    cubibobi
    Participant

    My guess is that the experience of an arahant can still be described by the same verse:

    cakkhuñca paṭicca rūpe ca uppajjati cakkhuviññāṇaṁ“, because:

    (1) For a living arahant, there is still a cakku pasada rupa and a hadaya vatthu.

    (2) Elsewhere Lal has explained that paticca in this context is “coming together” — not the same as “pati + icca” as in paticca samuppada. Thus, for an arahant, there is still paticca in this sense.

    We know that cakkhuviññāṇaṁ for an arahant is pure and vastly different from that of ours; it’s just not fathomable to us. If someone can make up a special term to describe that to help him understand better then it’s all good (perhaps something like “cakkhuñāṇaṁ” (without the “vi“)).

    Anyhow, it is much easier to draw the distinction between an arahant and us in the subsequent verse: there is NO “tiṇṇaṁ saṅgati phasso” for arahants, but there is for us. And this point can serve us better in terms of practice — to work to reduce “san“.

    Best,

    Lang

    in reply to: “Upadana” for Dhamma — Waharaka Thero sermon #44671
    cubibobi
    Participant

    Kusala-Mula PS is directed toward Nibbana. In this context, can chanda — as in Satara Iddhipada — be another substitute for upadana?

    My mind has been strongly conditioned to link tanha and upadana to Akusala-Mula PS. We now learn that they are neutral words, but it will take time to shake that off.

    Thank you.
    Lang

    in reply to: Compilation of my thoughts #44516
    cubibobi
    Participant

    Until then, humans see the cultivation of (abhi)saṅkhāra as “pleasure”.

     

    Is this “pleasure” also described by the word Assāda, as in Assāda, Ādīnava, Nissarana?

    Fascinating thread with much insight. Thank you!

    cubibobi
    Participant

    “Arahants don’t have vexation, that is why they don’t feel pleasure.”

     

    To be more precise, we can say that arahants don’t feel mental pleasure (somanassa vedana). They still feel sukkha vedana (and also dukha vedana, but NO domanassa vedana as you pointed out).

    A question about something totally unrelated: if we get a chance to take care of an arahant, to help make his/her physical life as comfortable as possible, then it is of tremendous merits for us, correct?

    Lang

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Goenka´s Vipassana – Part 2 #44162
    cubibobi
    Participant

    “Please let me know if anyone has seen him refer to various types of anusaya and abhisankhara. I need to review them to see if there are any explanations of those terms.”

    I can confirm a couple of things at this point:

    (1) There are no reference to anusaya and abhisankhara in the discourses from a 10-day course.

    That said, there are longer courses in this tradition: 20-day, 30-day, 45-day, 60-day.

    I don’t know if there are discourses in those longer courses. I do know for sure that the technique remains the same: scanning bodily sensations from head to toes.

    (2) Many practitioners in this tradition do believe that this practice alone leads to wisdom, that book knowledge is not necessary.

    Again, that said, there is a 7-day course that discussed the Satipatthana Sutta. Those who have gone through three 10-day courses can take this course.

    I just saw that the discourses for that course are also online:

    SN Goenka Mahasatipatthana Sutta Discourse (ENGLISH)

    The book used in this course has Pali / English side by side, and the English part is a word-for-word translation.

    It has been too long since I took that course. I will need to re-listen here and there, but I do remember the impression I had at that time: that he interpreted the Satipattana Sutta in a way to fit this technique, not the other way around.

    Finally, this tradition is not about breath meditation, but it does play an important role. Breath meditation is used to “sharpen” the mind so that the mind can observe subtler “realities”, meaning bodily sensations. For a 10-day course, the first 3 days are spent on breath meditation. For a 20-day course, I heard that the first 10 days were spent on breath meditation. Furthermore, they take breath meditation to be anapanasati.

    in reply to: Goenka´s Vipassana – Part 2 #44141
    cubibobi
    Participant

    Lal wrote:
    If you have a (preferably short) video on his description of “sankhara,” please post it so that we can get an idea of what he really means.

    For those who have taken the 10-day courses in this tradition, the following nightly discourses should be familiar.

    These are definitely not short, but I’ll point out a few segments which should be sufficient to get what is meant by sankhara in this technique. I know that when we pick and choose like this then then we are taking things out of context, but you do have the full discourses if you’d like to listen to all of them.

    Day 4:

    10 Day Vipassana Course – Day 4 (English)

    53:00 “The whole technique is to divide …”

    Day 4 is the day one starts on “vipassana“. From about 53:00 on he described the technique of dividing and dissecting bodily sensations, similar to what Jorg pointed out:

    “He or she would be able to reduce the coarseness of the sensations, resulting in more subtle sensations that feel more pleasant. This would also result in a reduced feeling of anger”.

    He also introduced sankhara here, as mental reaction to different types of physical sensations.

    Day 5:

    The first part of this day is again about dividing and dissecting sensations.
    15:00 : he introduced the noble truths, as related to this technique

    Starting around 39:00, he talked about paticca samuppada, starting with tanha
    39:00 : tanha
    42:00 : sankhara, avijja
    47:00 : where in the chain to break — vedana
    48:00 : anicca as the arising and passing away of sensations
    59:00 : sankhara
    1:00:00 : What full liberation is like, why sensations are the key

    Day 6

    21:00 : sankhara as related to the kalapas; 4 types of “food,” two of which are mental: sankhara old and new
    key to the technique: stop generating new sankhara (by not reacting to sensations with craving or aversion); then old sankhara arise and pass away.
    Full liberation happens when all old sankhara are gone.

    Best!

    in reply to: Goenka´s Vipassana – Part 2 #44053
    cubibobi
    Participant

    In

    Conditions for the Four Stages of Nibbāna

    Can we add tanha as another way to characterize the stages of nibbana: kāma tanhā, bhava hanhā, vibhava tanhā.

    vibhava tanhā is removed at the sōtapanna stage.

    kāma tanhā is weakened at the sakadāgāmi stage and removed at the anāgāmi stage.

    bhava tanhā is removed at the arahant stage.

    in reply to: Goenka´s Vipassana – Part 2 #44036
    cubibobi
    Participant

    “Since then, I’ve been feeling much more disenchanted about worldly things”.

    However much longer you have to go, you are definitely going in the right direction. I’d venture to speculate that you are going through nibbidā, which leads to virāgā, and then to nirodhā.

    Best!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Goenka´s Vipassana – Part 2 #43927
    cubibobi
    Participant

    Thank you, Lal.

    About formatting, the only formatting I’ve done so far is to italicize Pali words, which works fine per the instruction.

    I posted last night, after a long absence, and wonder if the following is happening with anybody:

    I wrote my post in Notepad and pasted it to the forum, italicizing here and there.
    Everything looked good before I submitted.
    Once I submitted, I saw line break formatting tags: “<br />” or something like it.
    I edited the post and removed them manually, but that did not work.

    Let’s see if that is happening with this post.

    Looks like it does, and there is no formatting of any words here, so it looks like the copying and pasting caused this.

    in reply to: Goenka´s Vipassana – Part 2 #43923
    cubibobi
    Participant

    I practiced the Goenka’s technique a number of years, and found it to be quite an oversimplification (and at times misrepresentation) of Buddha Dhamma. The benefits, as you pointed out, are the temporary relief one gets after attending a retreat.

    First, the verse you quoted:

    All saṅkhāras are impermanent.
    When you perceive this with true insight
    then you become detached from suffering;
    this is the path of purification.

    … is the translation of the Pali verse:

    Sabbe saṅkhārā aniccā” ti,
    yadā paññāya passati;
    Atha nibbindati dukkhe,
    esa maggo visuddhiyā.”

    …which is Dhammapada 277 and is explained in:

    Anuloma Khanti and Sammattaniyāma – Pre-requisites for a Sotapanna

    (See #7)

    This post is about Anuloma Khanti and Sammattaniyāma.

    At the start of the thread, you wrote:

    “…Another thought strongly came to mind, “Nibbana is the only way out.””

    It sounds like you may have realized Sammattaniyāma, and if that is the case then it is great!

    The oversimplification is that the method focuses on just bodily sensations: dukha vedana, sukha vedana, adukhamasukha vedana. It is explained that these sensations are manifestations of all mental phenomena, especially sankharā.

    Very briefly, the “vipassana” part of this technique involves moving attention from head to toes, noticing the sensation in each part of the body, and observing that sensation with a mindset of equanimity. (The “anapana” part of the technique is taken to be breath meditation).

    For those who are following this method, and this is all you do, then do not be surprised that after years and years of practice your gati seems to stay the same.

    Best,
    Lang

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 227 total)