Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Let me continue a little, hope you do not mind that I will be direct as I have a good intention for it – not to bash you anything but we need to be clear on everything :)
I learn from a lot of teachers, not just tipitaka, because I’m not competent enough to make my own translations so I have to get help from teachers like you.Teacher must attain Nibbana already. Tricky situation is that you can not know it, one need to have some roots or be affected by javana power of teacher to realize what is real when you encounter it. It’s just a small drop in the ocean why it’s so rare to be even born in earth like that and now consider encountering the real Dhamma in fake “buddhism” spread by hinduistic, new age or just watered down/wrongly translated version of it. We have everything as granted so one may feel like other traditions are ‘right’ to etc. while yoga or other aspects of spiritual traditions can have a positive impact on health but they can never lead to Nibbana.
during my dreams I had very severe nightmares that were related to my past-lives traumas.How do you know those are past lives? Can you confirm that? From what I understand we can only see past lives in 4th jhanas and not all people can do that, anyway. If you can confirm places, things that happen googling them or looking up for them then it will be all right but I highly doubt it they are related to past lives.
I don’t think that everything which is hinduistic must be wrong or useless. I consider myself buddhist, but I also respect wisdom of different traditions.As explained above, one can not consider himself “buddhist” – you false claiming. It’s like claiming that one is a mathematician but do not know how to count, subtract or add numbers. You are interested in “buddhism” but one becomes part of Sangha only when there are Ariyas – that is when one starting to become “buddhist”. Other tradition as explained are not useless, same as medicine or physics but the problem with them they can not cure everything neither then can explain everything so after attainment of Nibbana one understand what is wrong with them and limitations of their views/practices. If you aim is to attain Nibbana – yes they are useless in that, the rest is questionable and depends on many factors.
Perhaps the “dark night” you’re criticising has just not come yet? Or perhaps it does not come when practicing properly ;)It does not come when one practice properly.
I hope you’re right :) But I really can’t be sure yet. It would be great if path could be without eradication of kamma beeja. But I can’t dismiss that possibility entirelyYes you can, just start making sense out of things rather than blindly taking things to your liking/disliking and you will see that those statements are making no sense but for it one need to attain Sotapanna already to be on that stage of insight (Dhamma eye). Therefore Buddha explained 99% of suffering is gone after Sotapanna and having the right views because one never be deluded again by nothing, other tradition and religion, is like a person who constantly fall trap into MLM and pyramid schemes, you have some ideas about the future, hope and ignorance involved (nicca, atta, sukha) and because of that you got played by other religions, a teacher on that hope but there is no hope unless you understand and practice real Dhamma. Everything then Buddha Dhamma is asubha, only Dhamma is subha this will go over your head anyway and it will be understood if you attain Sotapanna stage, it will be clear.
About the rest of things I will not comment, practice real Dhamma and the rest will clarify itself if you are Tihetuka, if not just try to be the morally and insightful then there is big chance you will be born again as such.
First of all I really respect your position on this and it has shown something completely new about understanding Sotapanna as a being that has understood that everything in the 31 realm is anicca, dukkha, anattaIt not new, it was always there but wrongs translations and wrong interpretation of Dhamma is out there mostly, people got attached and used to something then it’s hard for them to realize the mistake and harm done to Dhamma.
Some call this hard stage “dark night of the soul” or “fear/disgust/suffering nanas” – beacuse some people have a lot of apaya kamma and this process of eradicating this kamma is very unpleasant for some.This is totally wrong, nothing like that happens in Dhamma and this is what is called “adhamma”. New age stuff that people are fascinated by it. One will Nibbana is not related to this world so those experiences are signs of wrong practice and view.
It is based on my personal experience and that of my friends. What is interesting, I’ve started my process of eradication of apaya sankharas even when I didn’t established samma ditthi, just did proper anariya jhanas. My friend did the same.Because you believed someone that this is “burning off apaya sankharas” (which is not) it does not mean that it actually the thing with right view one will know there is no “burning off” apaya sankharas – this is what hinduism believes. In real Dhamma there is no such thing, one can still have residue for apaya but will grab apaya bhava even after being serial killer (Angulimala).
Peoples personal feeling is what makes Dhamma being destroyed by time because they can not overcome them and just understand Tipitaka as it is so they do not apply themselves to the Tipitaka but Tipitaka to themselves that’s why Buddha Dhamma gets ruined over time. It’s better to understand it quickly or one can create very bad kamma for himself for making schism in Sangha.
We had sensations of re-living past-lives traumatic experiences (like murder, being in a war etc.) and we felt utter relief after re-living of sensation in jhanic state ended.This is not jhana but past-life regeression based on life. Jhana are definited experiences and one can not think that it was jhana or not because there are factors explained which one need to understand to recognize if it was jhana or not. You may experience samadhi and there is a lot of them, even if you read biographies of forest monks (which they do not practice Dhamma in the right view) they had experiences like that and refuted them not even calling them jhanas etc.
I think that Buddha stated that jhanas are one of imponderables. So all this distinction of 4 jhanas and explaining them is just a model and every teacher understands them differently. Truty is, there is INFINITE amounts of jhanic states (one of imponderables). Stating that fourth jhana is “light” isn’t really the case. For example for Ajahn Brahm, all 4 jhanas are light jhanas, while for some others (like Goenka), all four jhanas are not-light.That is wrong understanding and those people who you name have wrongs views about Dhamma and practice. Jhanas are not different from each other, in 4th jhana there is always light – if not then this not 4th jhana. Imagine getting on drugs and one believes that attained jhana – you would probably believe it as one need to have proper wisdom to what is what. Below jhana one can get into samadhi and experience quasi-jhana like experiences. I did that plenty before real Dhamma, I had so many experiences that I thought it was jhana related but non of them was so this is the same case. One learning what is real one learns what is fake and not real.
I think stream entry is more and harder than you describe, more than samma ditthi but rather actual eradication through jhana practice all kamma beeja relating to apayas and then experiencing at least once magga phala of sotapanna (nibbanic bliss)“What I think” is the crown of ignorance, if what we think was right we would not need Buddha at the first place. Stream entry is not harder or easier, everything is based on cause and effect, whatever hard/easy thing one have in the mind is related to ignorance. What you think is against Tipitaka, finding explanations to ones own delusions in Tipitaka it’s easy to do, finding the way it is – it’s not, that why one need Ariya at the first place to learn real Dhamma.
’m actually writing my P.hD. mostly about jhanas in theravada buddhist and I tell you, this subject is VAST and really, everyone has different version of itThis is what wrong with the “modern” interpretation of Dhamma, you post is also great example what wrong with that also – let it be a lesson for other and hope you will attain Nibbana the way it is possible rather then take on impossible roads that leads into lower realm in the future.
One can not remove kamma beeja – this is hinduism, Buddha clearly said that we can not burn off any kamma and it will never lead to Nibbana.
Come to the light side!! but if it’s too much for you then anyway wish you best on the Path :)
This sutta is wrongly translated because it’s make no sense + does not explain the proper practice here.
I will make this thread now with various suttas that worth sharing but keep in mind about the wrong translations and wrong terms used in english.
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn22/sn22.122.than.html
This is very good sutta which explains that one can attain Arahantship with Panna
The moment you started thinking bad about person you stared to creating bad kamma already. In Satipatthana person already failed to catch up that on Kāyānupassanā stage so last resort failed. I think even if you think bad about things that does not exists you will develop bad kamma by developing bad gathi and habits related to being bad. So it does not even matter if that person is dead, alive or even exists as one will then act up like that to everybody/everything at the end of the day. Dead body can not trigger anything as what triggers that PS cycle is the ignorance that people have in his mind and dead person or whatever is just point that person shoots up his ignorance.
1 user thanked author for this post.
First it’s crazy what kind of attitude and approach people have here sometimes. It’s like ants trying to figure it out something beyond their capability. Most people are not able to understand simple math but go into discussion based on their own limited view about world beginning, creation – it’s waste of time. Lal is clearly explaining what we can understand and make logical sense in relation to Dhamma, if you can not understand it do not try to substitute with your own ideas about it. Those matter are related closely to getting rid of hate, greed and lust – without that one will never understand those things because one does not have contrast or layout (Nibbana) to relate to it. What you have is only bunch of thoughts of “what I think” without any substance on ground. Somebody need put some people in check as it will bring endless conversation without any resolve. :D
First this speculation is only speculation is obvious acinteyya but let’s try to make logical sense out of it with some simplicity.
Life have no beginning but have an end (Nibbana), Nibbana have beginning but have no end. This make perfect sense in terms of how mechanics and nature works.
Laws of nature, mechanics of it and how life is created and destroyed does not need to be created by the first cause. It can be seen in human development the deeper insight into mechanics and outcomes and more technological advanced we became. There is whole spectrum of invisible world which we can not see so one having materialist world view and in general world view will have hard time figure it out thinking that all it is. Even pure materialist will see it true that there are many invisible factors that come into play even in development of matter, human scientific/material progress etc. which can be explained probably never be.
Stop thinking that you are that smart that you can figure it out. We are not more then ants or even less that just are pushed by hate, greed and lust. We will never know it but we can only make logical sense to Dhamma teachings and how Buddha explained it. It’s to connect some dots not to speculate, so stop speculating as it will make no sense and you will pile up the wrong views like fat on wrong diet.
If you want you can join our group which is related to pure dhamma but also to other pure dhammic teachers https://discord.gg/s6PMz7w you will find some people from your country too. :)
This is another new age hoax to sell out people hope for the future. Same as fad diets gurus and other people who make up things with a lot of buzz words – this is just another sect that keeps leeching of people suffering. :(
There is no real progress outside Dhamma – keep that in mind
Even going to the mundane and common sense – what is better learning alone things you do not understand or having someone who understand the topic? If I going to give you book on physics or math even for beginner you would have much more problems and trouble then person who have someone who is more advanced and have better understanding (better and PROPER) so you have a lot of clarity moments which it not necessary to be like that when doing things alone without any ideas what those things are about of having assumptions about them of how they are like :)
This does not need any Tipitaka reference. Not everything needs Tipitaka reference if one would be limited like christians or muslims to scriptures it means one is limited to those scriptures and does not develop any wisdom but just blind faith. Tipitaka is Dhamma which makes people develop wisdom so they can apply it to all sorts of things and come up with the clarity and see things the way they are :)
About the question you asked I will show you examples that can gives you a hint. Let say there is musician who can read the music (notes) but without knowing how to play and instrument and hearing one does not really experience the music one reads. Same with people on the Path, one needs to listen to the Dhamma to truly understand it as musicians needs to learn/listen to music to really understand the notes. :)
@Tobias G
The first case of talking to plants or rice is that everything is affected by energy that mind generates. If you generate bad intention or killing intention it can affect living organism to the extent of your javana power, same with metta. People with strong metta can actually trigger bliss factor in others people mind.
@Lal I didn’t mean Axel here really. Back in the days when I was researching supernatural stuff (and the things I experienced) most people just created content based on their imagination not experience to lure people by means of fantasy and “secrecy” but it’s not different then watching horror movie or any other things that excites mind, for those people it does not matter if it’s real or no. :)
I’m always vary and always trying to be rational when it comes to those materials as there is many new age made up stuff that people make to get attention of others for views and monetization to leech off people compulsive day-dreaming and to entertainment by straight lying about what really happens after death etc. but this I think is good one (but still can be made up for the sake of catch up audience)
