Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Yes. A viññāṇa (future expectation) becomes stronger via aññamañña PS: “nāmarūpa paccayā viññāna” followed by “viññāna paccayā nāmarūpa” followed by “nāmarūpa paccayā viññāna”, …
– It is a feedback loop that makes both nāmarūpa and viññāna grow.It is discussed in “Viññāna Paccayā Nāmarūpa”
Yes. It can work for a “mundane task” like a shopping list too.
Now, something else can come up to break that viññāṇa (future expectation).
– In the case of the shopping list for tomorrow, for example, if it turns out that you had to leave home immediately to go to a different city, that viññāṇa can “break” and you may not recall the shopping list anymore. Your mind then “knows” that there is no more need for that particualr shopping list.P.S. Also see, “Āsēvana and Aññamañña Paccayā“
Yes. That is right.
What you called a “non-kamma vinnana” is a namagotta. ALL our actions are recorded as namagotta, whether or not they may have kammic consequences.
– Those events with kammic consequences (i.e., kammic energy) are “dhammā“. In other words, namagotta with kammic energies are dhammā.Now, dhammā can bring vipaka on their own, when conditions are right.
But if we need to recall anything (namagotta with or without kammic energy) we need to make an effort to recall them. The brain sends a “cittaja ray (kirana)” to the vinnana dhatu and it comes back (reflected) with that memory.
I hope you can get an idea. Ask questions if not clear. I think I wrote about this in one post, but I cannot remember which post.
P.S. The following analogy may help with how we recall namagoatta.
Suppose, there is a chair in a dark room. If we walk into the room, we would not see the chair. But if we direct a flashlight to it, the light will reflect off the chair and we will see it.
– In the same way, we need to send a “beam of light” to the vinnana dhatu (nama loka), and only then it will reflect back with the memory.
– Our nama loka is very different from the rupa loka. We can recall memories (in nama loka) from anywhere. More in the next post.Please give the bullet # when quoting, so that I don’t have to read the whole post to find it.
Where does the quote appear?
P.S. I later saw that TGS has sent me an email too.
I think the confusion arose because of the following.
1. In the Suttas, there are only four jhana mentioned.
2. In Abhidhamma, the second jhana is split into two: “avitakka vicāramattaṃ samādhi (absence of vitakka with a trace of vicāra left)” AND “avitakka AVICARA samādhi (absence of BOTH vitakka and vicara)”P.P.S: Most suttas have just one (second one in the suttas) with “avitakka AVICARA samādhi (absence of BOTH vitakka and vicara)”.
The verse that TGS quote appears in #13 in the post “Vitakka, Vicāra, Savitakka, Savicāra, and Avitakka, Avicāra”
– So, it appears that different suttas describe jhanas a bit differently.
– But the main difference is whether there are 4 or 5 rupavacara jhanas, as mentioned above.Feel free to ask questions if this is not the issue.
cubibobi is quite right.
To make it easier, I must have copied the English translation somewhere else and made revisions to it. You can see that at the start of #4:
“Further, great king, with the removal of vitakka/vicāra (but savitakka/savicāra remain),..”At the second jhana, you get rid of any kāma and akusala thoughts.
– But nekkamma and kusala thoughts remain. Those will remain from that point on.See, “Vitakka, Vicāra, Savitakka, Savicāra, and Avitakka, Avicāra”
I need to revise the original post to make this clear. Thanks to TripleGemStudent for pointing that out.
TripleGemStudent wrote: ” In the end though, I would like to cease all sankhara’s because . . .
Sabbe sankhara anicca
Sabbe sankhara dukkha..”That is right. All sankhara are anicca nature. But we need to cultivate “punnabhisankhara” and “kusala-mula sankhara” until we get to the Arahant stage.
– Note that punnabhisankhara AUTOMATICALLY BECOME kusala-mula sankhara as one comprehends Tilakkhana/Paticca Samuppada/Four Noble Noble Truths.P.S. I just revised #4 of the post, “Jhānic Experience in Detail – Sāmaññaphala Sutta (DN 2)”
Hello Alfalco!
I have not yet written a separate post on 32 Parts of the Body meditation or “patikulamanasikāra.”
It is, of course, part of the Satipaṭṭhāna bhavana.
– I discussed it briefly in the post, “What is “Kāya” in Kāyānupassanā?”I am not sure how much you have learned about the Satipaṭṭhāna bhavana.
Here is a link to the posts on that:
“Mahā Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta”There is also a separate section on Meditation:
“Bhāvanā (Meditation)“Sorry, Aniduan. I somehow did not see your post.
I heard that the government has stopped pursuing that legislation. However, I don’t know whether the government made an official statement.
C. Sacket has sent me an email saying that he was unable to add the following to the above comment.
No other sentient being in our universe can be compared to a Samma Sambuddha. He surpasses all other beings in knowledge and power!!!
But still for the sake of curiosity, here is a good article:
“SIX UN-SHARED SUPER-NORMAL KNOWLEDGES (ASADHARANA NANA) OF LORD GAUTAMA BUDDHA“That is right.
– Kamma done with the mundane versions of alobha, adosa, amoha just have miccha ditthi as akusala.”Yes. In mundane versions of alobha, adosa, amoha, there can also be “raga for good deeds.”
– Also, we remember that “raga” means ” to give priority to goals in this world” or “to perpetuate the rebirth process.” See #3 of, “Lōbha, Rāga and Kāmacchanda, Kāmarāga”
– Beneath there is the view/perception that this world has permanent happiness to offer. That is there until Tilakkhana/Paticca Samuppada/Noble Truths are understood.Have you read the following post? It may explain some of your questions. Please feel free to ask any unanswered questions.
I am not sure, Tobias.
Since that section is in the Tipitaka, there must have been a reason to include them.
However, SOME accounts that I have seen IN TRANSLATIONS (either in English or Sinhala) seem unreal.
– But I have not tried to look at the Pali version to confirm the translations.
– There is enough to read in the Tipitaka outside that section!By the way, I have also not heard Waharaka Thero mention that section except in a couple of instances. It seems that he had also not allocated any significant time to that section.
Yes. These are complex issues.
We need to keep in mind that it was a Bodhisatta who gave that advice, not a Buddha.
The other thing to consider is the following.
– A society lives by certain laws. If murderers are not punished, they may commit more crimes.
– Noble Persons LIVE BY a different set of rules. Buddha did not obey those rules for HIMSELF. He saw that Angulimala had the wisdom to attain Nibbana and interfered while the King was getting ready to send an army to catch and kill him.
– On the other hand, Buddha did not try to interfere with the general laws of the society. It was legal to keep slaves at that time, and the Buddha did not try to change those laws. However, he freed some slaves (just by asking them to become bhikkhus) and the King did not interfere in such cases.NN99: Lord Buddha’s way is to get rid of wrong views. Not to spread wrong views and wrong interpretations.
I just realized that you may not have even read my posts on why anicca does not mean impermanence.
– If you like you can read them here:
Anicca, Dukkha, Anatta“impermanent nature of all things’”
That says all. Please don’t post any more videos. I will remove them.
