Yeos

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 61 through 66 (of 66 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Psychic Personhood, Embryo, Gandhabba, Origins #19465
    Yeos
    Participant

    @Tien

    No i don’t let sciences distract me as for the Path for Nibanna…my first aim is simply to live a more peaceful, insightful and under-control-life…as for Nibanna… it will be attained by this “current of life” in its next rebirths. Hopefully.

    in reply to: SN 56:46 – Darkness #19464
    Yeos
    Participant

    Interesting. some LHP esoteric circles call the intergalatic void plus the black holes ” The Dragon” / Tiamat or original Chaos as an alive force.

    in reply to: On the Asuras and alike #19463
    Yeos
    Participant

    Hi all


    @Christian
    : i’ll consult it still today no doubt.

    @Upekkha : such a vast and varied info…will not miss the Youtube videos.

    @Lal : faith AND insight or just faith ? Because i know alot of people that have faith in the Buddha but as for dhamma-insight ….i’ve my doubts…

    @Siebe: yes that’s the “philosophical” perspective wich is equally valuable, indeed. Mara’s domain : the whole Cosmos?

    thanks to all

    in reply to: Udayavaya nana – remaining 25 factors #18770
    Yeos
    Participant

    Very interesting but how can one effectively manage this in one’s daily life right now right here to evolve within Dhamma?

    in reply to: Money And Self – An Observation #18766
    Yeos
    Participant

    “It is not the eye nor the form that gives rise to…etc” Indeed that which gives rise to the seeing consciousness (as per pure dhamma logic) would be the gandhaba which includes the aggregates…

    Hi Johnny

    However you seem to equate :
    – a) getting an high degree of absorption ( 4the Jhana, 5tha Jhana and above ?) through singlepointed focus on a support like breathing (or other) to
    b) “to believe” in a self …

    but in fact a) and b) doesn’t have to be connected.
    Why would the attaining of the Jhanas through focusing on a concept be incompatible with attaining the Jhanas through breathing or any other kasina ? Both can be practiced and are complementary, now the only question remaining unanswered might be : which of the two is more effective in terms of “triggering” abhinna powers? Or putting it differently : how can “mere” contemplation/bhavana trigger “paranormal”/abhinna powers as the ones of the Buddha ?

    in reply to: Money And Self – An Observation #18470
    Yeos
    Participant

    Hello

    I’m surprised that you posted what you posted under the meditation label. Unless this school here equates bhavana (contemplation) to meditation. Personally i equate Dhyana/Jhana to meditative absorption through singlepointed focus on a concept (arya jhana) or through a kasina object which understands breathing too, and then it’s called anarya jhana because it doesn’t implie (apparently at least) objective insight. This said it’s an interesting contemplation yours.

Viewing 6 posts - 61 through 66 (of 66 total)