[Tobi-Wan Kenobi]

Hello Lal,

My friends asked me how your analysis of my theory and the answer to my questions turned out.

Can you address the following issues? I would appreciate that.

Again, for clarification, Burkhard Heim`stheory is correct physics, for example,how the string theory aspects. Even a well-educated physicist needs at least a year to familiarize themselves with it!
-I can express myself more clearly in German; German has more words than English..

In any case, the following are my questions.

Manōpubbangamā Dhammā

Manō pubbangamā dhammā Manō pubbangamā dhammā manō setthā manōmayā manō setthā manōmayā
manasā cē padutthēna manasā cē pasannēna
bhāsati vā karoti vā bhāsati vā karoti vā tatō nam dukkhamanvēti
tatō nam sukhamanvēti
cakkamva vahatō padam. chāyāva anapāyani.
(Dhammapada verses 1 and 2)

1. Manō is, of course, the mind. Dhammā (plural, not Buddha Dhamma) are the energies the mind generates (via javana power.) Dhammā means “to bear,” meaning “everything arises due to Dhammā.

2. Those dhammā then give rise to everything (all phenomena) in this world – whether living or inert.

3. Pubbangama (pubba + anga) means what comes first. The first line (in both verses) says the mind creates all dhammā that give rise to everything in this world. The second line says everything is prepared (settā) and manifests in mind (manōmayā).

4. The mind creates those Dhammā with thoughts (saṅkhāra.) That requires a lengthy explanation that can go to profound levels: “Buddha Dhamma – A Scientific Approach” and “Worldview of the Buddha.”

1. Mano the mind. Is Hadaya Vatthu + viññāna correct? In my theory, I only gave the Mano coordinates, i.e., a location with x5 + x6 in the universe. The processes remain the same PS, etc.
Where can I find something about the Javana power?
2. That makes sense
3. That makes sense too
4. In which sutta or where is this point described? Does the mind create those dhammā with thoughts (saṅkhāra.)?

Another question: What is the connection between the process of creation (Saṅkhāra) and attaining Nibbana? When someone attains Nibbana, is the universe still there for all other living beings? Or not?
– If we go to Paranibbana, do we disappear from the universe?
– This process represented in a formula would have to be embedded in an overall formula. Wouldn’t there a hole in the formula to account for all other processes?
Or is the piece simply shortened and gone? Will the universe remain after this?

[Tobi-Wan Kenobi]

Hello Lal,

Thank you for your analysis, great and correct as always.
I guess I have a distorted Saññā there.
I’ll work on that.

to point 1: The Burkhard Heim theory is correct physics and should only be seen as that, only better than school science.
Only the Buddha Dhamma brings us to Nibbana, all other theories are just crutches. That includes point 3 as well.
Manōpubbangamā Dhammā..
is in this context and also on the page dhammā…..with ā not lowercase?

to Point 2: I think my bad English is a bit to blame and writing always leaves room between the lines.
I also described a material universe that arises but then doesn’t completely cease and again arises an infinite loop.
Our own mind will always place us in the center of the universe and we will never see an end of the universe, not even with larger telescopes.

Thank you again for taking the time to help me in advance.
I could well use a sangha that knows puredhamma or better an ahrant to help me apply the noble eightfold path to eliminate my gati.
Unfortunately, there is no such noble thing in our country or I am not aware of it. So thank you Waharaka Abhyaratanalankara Thēro and also Lal that we having you!

sadhu, sadhu, sadhu

[Tobi-Wan Kenobi]

Hello Lal.

My interest is also more in the pure Dhamma. I was already out with my knowledge before that and confronted Hannes Schmid from 6 Dimensions in Color with your question and he said:
Yes. The principle of causality must also be reassessed: it has to recede the more highly organized the matter is. So, paradoxically, it may be true at the micro level, but not for more complex structures

6 Dimension in Color
and I agree with that

I would assume that the basis of everything is a spirit, everything consists of the encompassing spirit. From the cell, atom, suddhāṭṭhaka down to the smallest unit of the rupa and even the energies.
Our world with its 31 realms is embedded in mind, also known as the clear light, whatever that is. Nibbāna maybe?
Now to the mechanism that comes from x5 and interacting with x6.
So responsible x5 seat of our consciousness embedded in the Infinite Invisible Consciousness and the docking points for our data storage Gati, Namaloka, Rūpakkhandha etc. and x6 the Hadaya Vatthu seat of our mind.

The two together Consciousness (Viññāṇa) and Spirit (Hadaya Vatthu) create a state of mind with the well-known mechanisms Rupa, Citta, Cetasika, Gati. I would describe this state of mind as probability.
A unicellular organism is very likely in our world, an atom even more so, humans are rare and a Buddha even rarer. We all know the story about the turtle and the ring.

So this attitude of mind, like the mechanism with the spin, creates a similar image, a structure (this image/structure consists of kamma energies) like that of the four realms, apayas, kama loka, rupa loka and arupa loka, so that we without time Delay appear in the appropriate loka/room.

The key is the mindset. So the composition of the energies behind it (e.g. Kama energy), what happens to us in the cuti and patisandhi moment and to which stream, area we attach ourselves.

That’s how I understand it.

PS Briefly on structure: Structure is an organizational principle. In my example, a Din A4 sheet has the structure 1 and if I fold this sheet of paper into a paper airplane,
It gets a higher structure. Let’s say 10 and each intermediate step from sheet to
Paper airplane thus has the next higher level. So also a direction that is irreversible.

[Tobi-Wan Kenobi]

Hello Lal

Lal said:

This experiment has been done on electrons and photons separately, i.e., similar interference patterns have been observed when the experiment was done with a single electron or a single photon.

to evaluate would be:
In the sense that the place of energy transfer is determined by the interaction of a single probability wave with the transcomponents of the particles of the screen material.

And yes, consciousness has nothing to do with it…. sorry for my English

The Burkhard Heim page can be changed from German to English

[Tobi-Wan Kenobi]

Hello Lal….. here is the interpretation that I think is good.
I hope this is translated well by me?

It is always crucial how we interpret the world or a formula

So the double-slit experiment is seen in the world as it is, only people interpret it wrongly or differently. There are many interpretations such as “The Copenhagen Interpretation. It has neither. With the wave-particle dualism still to do with consciousness? That the photon behaves like this.
A photon has the nature of a probability wave. And has hardly any mass. Therefore, a photon is in a 6 dimensional world. As Burkhard Heim describes it. Not present in space as it is present in the transcoordinate ( x4) x5 and x6. As a result, the photon lacks structure in space. The electron absorbs the energy of the photon when it hits the slit and since they both have wave characteristics, they are superimposed in this experiment. The particle character occurs when energy is transferred to spatial components. This is always the case, for example, when an electron emits a photon or recombines with one at the moment of interaction to form a particle, because it releases or transfers its energy at a specific location. But it is and has a wave character to the end.

At the slit, the electron interacts with the material (of the slit) in a way that it does not spatially transfer energy, but where only the wave character is superimposed and this creates two probability waves behind the double slit. Those electrons that spatially interact with the material of the gap repel each other and are no longer registered anywhere. The disappearances from the experiment. If I now observe my electron by forcing it to emit a photon at the moment of passage through the double slit, then the particle wave is set to reset, so to speak. Because a spatial interaction takes place here. Then, viewed from the specific slit, it propagates as a particle wave, as a new material wave in the direction of the screen. And that just appears as a blob on the screen.
The wave character of quantum mechanical objects is a purely transcendent temporal property and an interaction of transcendent temporal terms of my quantum mechanical objects.

6 dimensional world by Burkhard Heim

x1 to x3 = The lengths/or Space

x4 = Time

from here it starts———————————transcendence

x5 = structure

x6 = The will or the target dynamics

http://heim-theory.com/?page_id=173

[Tobi-Wan Kenobi]

Aybowan…..for everyone

In short I’d say that’s correct, but there are several invisible loops involved.

I’ll go into more detail about seeing from my point of view
explain to see if my thinking is right.

(i) there is a sensory experience, i.e. an ārammaṇa.

(ii) Seeing which, upon ignorance (avijja) before, leads to rebirth (bhava taṇhā) with the sight arising from karma and karma vipaka, with the sight (light and dark) that this sight-consciousness causes. This trinity as seeing-consciousness (cakkhu viññāna) merges into consciousness.

(iii) that consciousness (vipāka viññāna) with citta, cetasika and garthi/garti, where cetasika and garthi/garti decide whether we attach with tanhā (we cling with greed or hatred whatever avijja involves).

(iii/b) However, immediately after the arising of a vipāka viññāna, a paṭicca samuppāda process takes place in the next citta.

(iv) through tanhā, then, abhisaṅkhāra arises

With memories, there is no ārammaṇa at (i) but a Dhamma from the mind entering at point (iii). To make it short.

I hope it’s okay to say something as well because these are important steps and I’m really looking forward to Lal’s analysis.

PS Sorry I wasn’t fast enough. I wanted answers before Lal.
But I still send and then look at the chart.

[Tobi-Wan Kenobi]

Ayubowan…Lal

I find your website outstanding and you can immediately see from the structure that you have a very high understanding of the Dhamma. The loading time of the website is ok.

Related to
I worry about this issue. Someone who may not have much exposure to Buddha Dhamma/Buddhism may be confused when first clicking on this website. Many posts are on advanced concepts.
– Furthermore, the website is getting big and taking time to load. Seng Kiat and I have been looking for ways to speed up the site.
– Another idea that came to my mind yesterday is whether we should start another website for beginners. I own the puredhamma.info registration.
– Some posts, including the “Moral Living and Fundamentals” section, can be moved to that new website.
– Furthermore, WordPress websites are a bit difficult to manage. It could be a good idea to start the new website on the new platform, Ghost CMS. I did some research yesterday (YouTube is a great resource for that), and the Ghost platform seems simple and easy to manage.
– Comments/suggestions are appreciated.

But I still had some thoughts.

I’ve worked a lot with CMS Joomla, it’s fast mostly OSS and well structured with a good back-end and lots of extensions.
But WordPress isn’t bad either, just a matter of taste.

The provider and the server system are always important for the speed, whether it is old or new, or Apache etc.
You would have to talk to the provider if there are still parking options.
The provider can usually help there.

Then, of course, place pictures as small as possible at the start of loading and the important things in the “head”, header area of ​​the home page. Delete unnecessary plugins/extensions, and update them regularly.
If the CMS has a caching feature it should be enabled, or some other type of compression (e.g. GZIP).

I was wondering:
How do you think the Buddha would have created a website?
????????

After starting the website, a cookie query with the option to set it to Beginners, Sōtapanna, Anāgāmi and Monks maybe.

This cookie query then changes the directory structure/folder structure as necessary for the desired degree of progress and as desired by the surfer.

(I might not use the term beginner but something that motivates to start learning in stages.)
With this cookie circuit, you have several websites on one web page, so to speak.
Extensive user rights management (ACL) is therefore important
The cookie position with a popup maybe and an additional button somewhere on the home page.
The right template (website) for the end device, such as mobile smartphone, tablet, etc.
So the CMS has to make a query in the background and, if necessary, change the template/website or overwrite it with the mobile page.

1. A classification as is customary in
Home // Forum // Members Area // Video………………………………Search function

The Practice of the Dhamma // Abhidhamma // Dhamma and Science // Meditation // Tables and Summaries

Something like that, that’s just an example of a directory structure/folder structure

I hope it is a small suggestion, if you have many ideas to choose from, you can choose the best one, as you know.

Greetings from Tobi-Wan Kenobi or just Tobi

May the best be found for all Dhamma friends

[Author]

Posts