post on “An Apparent “Self” Is Involved in Kamma Generation” Search for: This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by Lal. Viewing 1 reply thread Author Posts October 14, 2022 at 5:13 pm #40885 dosakkhayoParticipant An Apparent “Self” Is Involved in Kamma Generation “Only an Arahant has no saññā vipallāsa and asmi māna.” But a sotapanna removed nicca saññā vipallāsa. So it should be revised. Of course, it covers the context of sakkaya”. October 14, 2022 at 6:32 pm #40887 LalKeymaster “But a sotapanna removed nicca saññā vipallāsa.” – That is not correct. But what I had in #18 of that post was not quite right either. I just revised that sentence (in #18) as follows: “Saññā vipallāsa goes away at the Anāgami stage, and citta vipallāsa (together with asmi māna) is removed at the Arahant stage. See “Vipallāsa (Diṭṭhi, Saññā, Citta) Affect Saṅkhāra.” Author Posts Viewing 1 reply thread You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Log In Username: Password: Keep me signed in Log In