post on “An Apparent “Self” Is Involved in Kamma Generation”

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by Lal.
Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #40885
      dosakkhayo
      Participant

      An Apparent “Self” Is Involved in Kamma Generation

      “Only an Arahant has no saññā vipallāsa and asmi māna.”

      But a sotapanna removed nicca saññā vipallāsa. So it should be revised. Of course, it covers the context of sakkaya”.

    • #40887
      Lal
      Keymaster

      “But a sotapanna removed nicca saññā vipallāsa.”
      – That is not correct. But what I had in #18 of that post was not quite right either. I just revised that sentence (in #18) as follows:

      Saññā vipallāsa goes away at the Anāgami stage, and citta vipallāsa (together with asmi māna) is removed at the Arahant stage. See “Vipallāsa (Diṭṭhi, Saññā, Citta) Affect Saṅkhāra.”

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.