“As in common law, ignorance of Nature’s laws is not an excuse.”
Before I met Pure Dhamma, I wrote some articles introducing Buddhist books on the Internet.
I thought it was Buddha sasana at the time, so I recommended it to others, saying that it is Buddha’s teachings.
Of course, after learning about Pure Dhamma, I deleted the posts. Because it’s become clear to me that these could no longer be called Buddha sasana.
I wonder whether the act of the past applies to sanghabheda.
To be more precise, could you tell me the kamma patha of sangha bedha?