Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jittananto
ParticipantCat, if I understand your situation correctly, you want to live as far away from the causes of greed and sensuality as possible. I understand, but as Sir Lal and Yash explained, there is nothing wrong with earning money and cooking for yourself. Many great lay disciples of Lord Buddha were millionaires (today they would have billions!). Of course, they had more than the minimum. However, they managed to attain the sotāpanna stage and other stages while retaining their fortunes. Lord Buddha’s father, King Suddhodana became an anagami and continued to fulfill his duty as a monarch.
So there is nothing wrong with money and food. What is bad is acting with ignorance (believing that food will give us happiness), greed (wanting to have all the food for yourself), and anger (eating to alleviate sadness). The same thing applies to money and the other 3 necessities (clothes, houses and medicine).
You seem inclined towards a life of total renunciation. I suggest only one thing to you, my friend, go and live in the company of the Noble Maha Sangha of Jethavaranama monastery. You have two choices there: either you train for two years to become a monk, or you stay as an anagarika with 10 precepts. The monastery will help you with the visa etc. Don’t wait, my friend; follow your desire to live the Dhamma fully. If you are interested, I can put you in contact with Sir Harsha, who is the layman responsible for organizing meetings with Bhikkhus. Ask advice from the venerable bhikkhus of the monastery and make a decision on what you want to do my friend.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Jittananto
ParticipantHello Cat! In your first response, you mentioned the importance of the noble Maha Sangha. If you would like to speak with bhikkhus, the monks at Jethavaranama Monastery organize online personal meetings with laypeople. They can provide you with advice tailored to your situation on your path.
1 user thanked author for this post.
February 2, 2025 at 9:17 am in reply to: Jethavanarama Buddhist Monastery – English Discourses #53422Jittananto
ParticipantYes, Bhante also said that it’s almost impossible for an average human to truly know what it feels like to have no desire for anything. The majority of humans are frightened by the idea of losing their desires. To have a better idea, one must be at least a sotāpanna!
- To make sure I understand. Suppose a restaurant distributes rotten food to 5 people. The first person is an average human, the second is a sotāpanna, the third is a sakadāgāmi, the fourth is an anagami and the last is an arahant. The average human will generate disgust and anger(Dosa). He may even want to attack the restaurant owner physically or verbally. He may even try to close the restaurant by suing them. The Sotāpanna and the Sakadāgāmi will be disgusted and may generate mental aversion (Patigha), but they will not want to attack the restaurant owner or the restaurant. The anagami and the arahant will just tell themselves that it is not appropriate to eat rotten food because it is disgusting for the human body, but they will not generate the slightest trace of aversion(Patigha) and will always be in the 4 Brahmas viharas (Metta, Karuna, Mudita and Uppekha).
February 1, 2025 at 10:55 pm in reply to: Jethavanarama Buddhist Monastery – English Discourses #53418Jittananto
Participant“It is hard to say. We can only guess. It is possible that memories of trauma may not bother them. “
Yes, he said they will remember they have traumas, but they will never suffer because of that again.
“Even Arahants experience “manāpa/amanāpa” or a sense of “like/dislike” generated by that “distorted saññā.”
Yes, but what he means is that, for example, if an arahant loses his tongue or sense of taste, he or she will never feel sad or confused about it. They will know something is missing or wrong with their body, but they will not be sad about it.
February 1, 2025 at 7:21 pm in reply to: Jethavanarama Buddhist Monastery – English Discourses #53414Jittananto
ParticipantSir, Bhante mentioned that when a person becomes an arahant, even their traumas disappear. For instance, someone who is claustrophobic , fears animals, or has experienced personal traumas such as rape and intimidation—along with paranoia and various fears—will no longer experience these issues at the arahant stage. Do you agree with this perspective? I ask because there are cases where some attitudes seem to persist even among arahants. For example, there was an arahant who spoke inappropriately to others; I can’t recall his name or story. If I am not mistaken only the Lord Buddha is completely devoid of all idiosyncrasies. Personally, I am convinced that all fears disappear once one reaches the arahant stage, but I ask to know if it is coherent with the suttas.
Bhante also said that taste is a useless sense. Is that true for science? He said we can live correctly without taste. If we suffer from the loss of taste, it is because of our attachment to taste. We believe there is a real taste but the taste is a mirage.
February 1, 2025 at 1:35 pm in reply to: Jethavanarama Buddhist Monastery – English Discourses #53410Jittananto
ParticipantAlso, listen at 37 minutes !
February 1, 2025 at 12:34 pm in reply to: Jethavanarama Buddhist Monastery – English Discourses #53408Jittananto
ParticipantThere is an excellent sermon where Venerable Bhante Amadassana Thero talks about exactly the same thing as Sir Lal: mind-made world. He explains to the audience that the world is entirely mental. He also explains that an arahant is not a robot and that he or she can perceive rotten food but he or she will not generate aversion to that food. If an average human was offered to eat food he or she would be disgusted and will generate aversion.
Start Listen at 8:30 min until 30 min.
There is one thing I noticed. The majority of the explanations of the articles that Sir Lal publishes on the site can be found in the sermons of the Jethavaranama monastery (in a less precise way). The only difference is accuracy and audience type. Bhante speaks to an audience composed of non-Buddhists (Christians, Muslims, Hindus, atheists) and beginner Buddhists. He will try to simplify the explanations and even change the names of terms so that the audience understands better. He tries not to go too far. For example, sometimes he will call Kamma Vipāka God. In many of his sermons, he said God. This is to make Christians and Muslims more comfortable and more attentive to the sermons. People understand teachings better when they are spoken about concepts they understand. A good teacher must take into account the level of his audience. What is certain is that with each sermon, he goes deeper and deeper. A month ago he started talking about Hadaya vatthu. He simply called it the base of the spirit and explained that this is where we must purify, not outside. Sir Lal goes further in his articles with examples of the suttas and uses the names of the terms. It is more suitable for Buddhists who have a good basic understanding and want to understand further.
This is why a SammāsamBuddha is the ultimate teacher because he knows perfectly how to teach a person according to his mental disposition. Even a Venerable Arahant is not capable of doing this always. Think about the story of Venerable Arahant Culapanthaka. His elder brother, who is the Venerable Arahant Mahapanthaka, told him to leave the monastic life because he did not understand the Dhamma. Venerable Mahapanthaka is an arahant so he always acts for the good of a being. He thought it was for his little brother’s sake that he told him to leave the Sangha. However, Venerable Culapanthaka became an arahant with Iddhi powers after following very simple instructions from Lord Buddha.
- Some of us have difficulty teaching the Dhamma to our loved ones because they reject or do not understand. We must be careful not to conclude that they are stupid for not striving for the Dhamma. Maybe if they have the right person to message them, they can become ariyas on the spot. Often paramis will mature at another time in their lives. An example is the mother of Venerable Sariputta who became a sotāpanna at the age of 100. All her life she rejected the Buddha Dhamma and cried for having understood the Dhamma at the time of her son’s death.
January 27, 2025 at 12:51 pm in reply to: Bāhiya, Pukkusāti, Tambadathika – All Killed by the Same Cow #53355Jittananto
ParticipantI also wanted to add that what we give is what we receive as long as we have the conditions to receive it.
- Suppose a serial killer who has not committed anantariya kamma becomes a Sakadāgāmi deva or anagami Brahma, he will no longer receive bad Vipāka. He will no longer be able to be killed, hurt, get sick, abuse, steal, deceive etc. They do not have the condition to receive the effects of the causes which they have sown in the past which is the possession of a dense body.
- An arahant with a dense body has eliminated the possibility of creating a new Kamma (kriya kamma), but he will continue to experience the causes (unhealthy actions committed in the cycle of rebirths) and effects (injuries, pain, murder, illnesses, etc.) because of his dense body(condition). Angulimala received beatings from the families of his victims even when he became an arahant. If Angulimala had become an anagami Brahma or a sakadāgāmi deva, none of this would have happened to him. A Brahma has a body too subtle to suffer. If women who commit abortion at least succeed in becoming Ariya devas and Brahmas, they can escape the bad consequences of their actions. However, it is very rare for one to become Ariya after performing extreme acts like this.
The case of Venerable Angulimala was exceptional, if Lord Buddha had not come, he would have been executed by the king’s soldiers and would have taken rebirth in a niraya. Those who become ariya after performing this kind of action are those who have powerful paramis. Angulimala was a yogi in a past life, so he probably developed jhanas. See the Jayaddisa Jataka.
See also the Video of the Wat San fran Monastery : Jayaddisa jataka.
Jittananto
ParticipantThank you, Sir. I tried to stay in this thread, but it was closed. This is why I sent the Tambadhatika story elsewhere in the forum.
Jittananto
ParticipantMany non-Buddhists hold a deep respect for Lord Buddha and believe that the teachings of Buddhism (Buddha Dhamma) can lead to genuine happiness. They may only be missing certain paramis or Kusalas to fully embark on this path. A notable example of this is Sadguru Sri Madusudan(a Hindu devotee), who visited the Jethavaranama monastery recently.
See Visit of Sadguru Sri Madhusudan Sai to our monastery
1 user thanked author for this post.
Jittananto
ParticipantIn the context of this sutta, can we say that the Dhamma is empty of error?
Jittananto
ParticipantThank you for the post, Sir !
Jittananto
ParticipantThank you Hugo 🙏🏿 May you attain the supreme bliss of Nibbāna🙏🏿🪷🌸
Sādhu Sādhu Sādhu ☸️
Jittananto
ParticipantYou’re welcome, Sir. Thank you for sharing the Venerable Waharaka Thero’s suttas chanting🙏🏿 is very appreciated.
- Another story is that of a peta who was the mother of Venerable Arahant Sāriputta and Venerable Arahant Maha Mogallana in a past life. Venerable Sāriputta built accommodations, brought food and called 3 arahants to offer them. He then dedicated this offering in honour of his deceased mother. As a result of this positive action, she acquired heavenly beauty and great relief from her sufferings. See Sāriputtattheramātupetivatthu
- If someone wants to learn more about these stories, I advise you to read the Pettavatthu. These are collections of stories of Petas who suffer due to their evil actions and some of them receive relief when they meet ariyas.
Jittananto
ParticipantHugo write : When the Buddha had a backache, no being in the universe could make it go away.
- In a sutta the Lord Buddha was healed by the Venerable Arahant Mahacunda who recited the 7 factors of awakening.Tatiyagilānasutta
At one time the Buddha was staying near Rājagaha, in the Bamboo Grove, the squirrels’ feeding ground.
Ekaṁ samayaṁ bhagavā rājagahe viharati veḷuvane kalandakanivāpe.
Now at that time he was sick, suffering, gravely ill.
Tena kho pana samayena bhagavā ābādhiko hoti dukkhito bāḷhagilāno.
Then Venerable Mahācunda went up to the Buddha, bowed, and sat down to one side. The Buddha said to him:
Atha kho āyasmā mahācundo yena bhagavā tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā bhagavantaṁ abhivādetvā ekamantaṁ nisīdi. Ekamantaṁ nisinnaṁ kho āyasmantaṁ mahācundaṁ bhagavā etadavoca:
“Cunda, express your understanding of the awakening factors.”
“paṭibhantu taṁ, cunda, bojjhaṅgā”ti.
“Sir, the Buddha has rightly explained these seven awakening factors. When developed and cultivated, they lead to direct knowledge, to awakening, and to extinguishment.
“Sattime, bhante, bojjhaṅgā bhagavatā sammadakkhātā bhāvitā bahulīkatā abhiññāya sambodhāya nibbānāya saṁvattanti.
What seven?
Katame satta?
The awakening factors of mindfulness, investigation of principles, energy, rapture, tranquility, immersion, and equanimity.
Satisambojjhaṅgo kho, bhante, bhagavatā sammadakkhāto bhāvito bahulīkato abhiññāya sambodhāya nibbānāya saṁvattati …pe… upekkhāsambojjhaṅgo kho, bhante, bhagavatā sammadakkhāto bhāvito bahulīkato abhiññāya sambodhāya nibbānāya saṁvattati.
These are the seven awakening factors that the Buddha has rightly explained. When developed and cultivated, they lead to direct knowledge, to awakening, and to extinguishment.”
Ime kho, bhante, satta bojjhaṅgā bhagavatā sammadakkhātā bhāvitā bahulīkatā abhiññāya sambodhāya nibbānāya saṁvattantī”ti.
“Indeed, Cunda, these are awakening factors!
“Taggha, cunda, bojjhaṅgā;
Indeed, Cunda, these are awakening factors!”
taggha, cunda, bojjhaṅgā”ti.
This is what Cunda said,
Idamavocāyasmā cundo.
and the teacher approved.
Samanuñño satthā ahosi.
And that’s how the Buddha recovered from that illness.
Vuṭṭhahi ca bhagavā tamhā ābādhā.
Tathāpahīno ca bhagavato so ābādho ahosīti.
-
AuthorPosts