I might be wrong.
A. Sotapanna is sanditthika. This means that he/she has realized that “san” is problematic and has become someone who can discern and eliminate it.
B. sotapanna eliminates three samyojanas: sakkaya ditthi, silabbata paramasa, and vicikicca.
I thought that perhaps these two things could be connected.
According to my understanding, sakkaya ditthi is not knowing the dangers of raga.
Also, silabbata paramasa is not knowing how to completely resolve dosa.
Similarly, vicikicca is not knowing how to deal with moha.
In this way, I thought that the three samyojanas are connected to the three “san.”
Because a sotapanna has seen that “san” is the problem, they have completely removed the three samyojanas.
Is it okay to understand it like this?