Reply To: Posts Related to “Distorted Saññā”


The point is that a baby does not have any idea about  ‘sakkāya’ (i.e., attachment) or sakkāya diṭṭhi (wrong view about attachment). The question is, “Why is that the case?” or “How is that possible?” 

  • Has the baby removed all samyojana/gati/anusaya etc.?
  • Obviously, a baby has NOT removed all samyojana/gati/anusaya, etc. If that were the case, a baby would be born an Arahant
  • So, what explains the observation?