I agree with Jaro that the discourse does not describe what “anicca” is.
- However, it does clarify that “anicca” means much more than “impermanence.”
Gad (or anyone else who saw the correct interpretation from that discourse): please let us know precisely at what time interval the correct interpretation of “anicca” is explained.
- I listened from around the 1-hour mark, as Jaro suggested.
