In this same post,
===
In Point #2,
The Buddha points out that those aggregates CANNOT be under one’s control in that first part.
I think we should write it as “CANNOT be under one’s COMPLETE control”.
Otherwise, it might be misinterpreted to support “fatalistic/deterministic” philosophy.
Because, mind can decide to experience some PañcakKhanda over other PañcakKhanda, Subject to causes+conditions.
Example. Deciding to Watch sermon over watching movie.
===
In point #4,
For example, suppose I saw the world center towers before their destruction in the terrorist attack in 2011.
You mean 2001, right?
Hope that pointing out this kind of factual but not dhamma-related error is also fine with you Lal.