Reply To: Goenka´s Vipassana – Part 2


I’ve revised it partly. When I finish it up I’ll mail it again!

If it’s possible, Lal, are you able to elaborate further on what you posted earlier in #43914:

“1. OK. It is possible that a Sotapanna would have removed “Issa.” It is not an akusala by itself. It is an “occasional asobhana cetasika” that can arise in an akusala citta

  • I wrote that post some years back, so I need to check how I made that Table. I will check on it and comment here later on.”