Buddha didn’t say what he WANTED TO SAY.
He said what was. He used what is termed as “scientific method”. Except he had unfathomable microscope (most powerful mind) to observe evrything he talked about. He also, never usually talked about something he could see, but noone else could.
He analysed what was out there.
Explained to us how it is, as it is.
There is no arguments about what buddha said more than there is arguments on boiling temperature of water.