The way you commented shows too much tanha/reactivity…why ? And your reading was pervaded by the same emotions: as I clearly stated Brahman it’s different from Brahma, the latter being a “mere” deva, the former “being” the Absolute.
As far as i know it’s one of the rare subjects that the Buddha preferred not to answer to – which i perfectly understand…
Personally i don’t fall into the trap of taking sides – i rather choose suspension of judgement. My practices are mainly based upon the Dhamma yet historically/ culturally speaking i find the subject interesting.
Did you or any other sangha fellow here watch the movie Life of Pi ?