Reply To: Goenka´s Vipassana
…Lal has explained what this verse means above (#15237): “All types of vedana coming together to lead to each and all dhammā”. After learning things from puredhamma.net for a while…
A Quest to Recover Buddha's True Teachings
…Lal has explained what this verse means above (#15237): “All types of vedana coming together to lead to each and all dhammā”. After learning things from puredhamma.net for a while…
Can heat in the mind, tapa, be a kamma vipaka or is it Always a samphassa ja vedana, a domanassa vedana? For me, it feels more like it can be…
…samphassa-ja-vedana. See, “Dukkha Samudaya Starts With Samphassa-Jā-Vedanā” – That is when we start acting with avijja, i.e., that is when we start doing (abhi) sankhara with “avijja paccaya sankhara”. 3….
…Yampidaṃ cakkhusamphassapaccayā uppajjati vedayitaṃ sukhaṃ vā dukkhaṃ vā adukkhamasukhaṃ vā tampi anattā; tatra te chando pahātabbo …” Translated: “The eye, sights, eye-consciousness, and eye “san-contact” (samphassa) are without essence: you…
…sotapanna‘s Tanha cannot be the level of apayagami. (O) Because apayagami gati has removed. So, in the “arammana – vipaka vinnana – gati to attach – samphassa – samphassa ja…
…samphassa – samphassa ja vedana – tanha” process, “apayagami gati to attach” step can not happen. Therefore, apayagami level tanha can not happen too.” – P.S. Thus, a Sotapanna is…
…“puts together a citta” by automatically incorporating other relevant cetasika according to one’s “gati.” Ekaggata is the salient factor in Samādhi. Consciousness cannot arise without phassa. Note that samphassa differs…
…is. Therefore, the paccaya in the ‘samphassa paccaya samphassa-jā-vedanā’ step is the certain types of anusaya or sangati corresponding to the given ārammaṇa. Is it okay to understand like this?…
…would be an Arahant. In the same way, one needs to do the same for rupa, cakkhu viññāṇa, cakkhu samphassa, and cakkhu samphassa-jā-vedanā. “Jānato Passato” Makes One a Noble Person…
For us to generate abhisankhara, defiled vinnana, salyatana, samphassa, samphassa ja vedana, are we not attached to the vipaka (have tanha for it) in the first place? Why is tanha…