[Lal]

There is no need to follow “rules” especially if one is not a bhikkhu.
– The main point is one needs to eat when one is hungry.
– As one cultivates the path, one will automatically lose CRAVING for food (or any other sensory pleasures.)
– But you already seem to be there!

It would be a good idea to read the recent post, “Vinaya Piṭaka – More Than Disciplinary Rules”

The following is from that post:

4. For many years after the Buddha’s Enlightenment, there were no disciplinary rules for the bhikkhus. Those who ordained as bhikkhus in those early years had fulfilled most of their “pāramitā” and did not need much clarification of dhamma concepts. They also were ‘self-disciplined,” and it was not necessary to impose rules.

– Most Vinaya rules were set up to handle particular situations where one or more bhikkhus had done things that were not appropriate. The Vinaya Piṭaka provides background accounts for many such cases. Such accounts provide insights into dhamma concepts as well as providing reasons for enacting such rules.
– For example, there was no rule for the bhikkhus to abstain from eating after Noon. There were few other reasons to impose that rule, but one reason was to discipline those who started wearing robes to “live an easy life.” That rule was enacted probably after 20 years or so, and by that time, most people had become faithful followers of the Buddha. They held bhikkhus in high regard and took care of all their needs.
– There is an account in the Vinaya Piṭaka for another reason for that rule. One bhikkhu went for an alms-collection after dark, and a woman had thrown dirty water from a cooking pot at the bhikkhu because she could not see him.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Jittananto

[Lal]

Thank you, Jay!

I just revised the first post on this thread to revise the link.

Thanks to Johnny too!

[Lal]

Dr. Egnor (a neurosurgeon) has more videos on the subject:

“Michael Egnor: The Evidence against Materialism“

[Lal]

The words “pancakkhandha” and “panca upadanakkhadha” could sound too abstract.

It could be easier to visualize “world” and “those things in the world that one craves“.

Each person’s “pancakkhandha” or the “world” is his/her own.
– In the same way, “panca upadanakkhadha” is one’s own. Different people crave different things.

With those cravings, a person would think, speak, and do deeds via mano, vaci, and kaya sankhara with the hope of “enjoying life.”
– But one generates MOST of those sankhara with avijja (“avijja paccaya sankhara“), because one does not realize the long-term bad consequences of such desires. In particular, any immoral deeds done (with the mind, speech, or actions) WILL lead to dangerous consequences.

It is good to think in terms of Noble Truths, Paticca Samuppada, and Tilakkhana. They are all inter-connected.
– Of course, the “big picture” of a rebirth process among 31 realms must be contemplated.

[Lal]

Thank you for clarifying that, Jay.

Yes. It is possible that I missed that part you quoted above. I will try to listen to it again and will post if I see anything otherwise.

It is commendable that Venerable Bhikkhu Samāhita provided those insights.

It must be noted that these details about the manomaya kaya (gandhabba) are not available in detail in the Tipitaka.
– Those details were in the Sinhala Atthakatha (early commentaries) that have been lost.
– So, it is only when a Jati Sotapanna like Waharaka Thero (who had learned these details in a previous life) is born and is able to provide details, that we get to see the details. Not all Jati Sotapannas can provide such details either.
– Those details can be backed by recent findings in science. Furthermore, many accounts of rebirth stories, Near-Death Experiences, Out-of-Body Experiences, etc. are now available thanks to the internet. Both provide invaluable supporting material to this complex subject.

The role of the manomaya kaya is very important since the physical body is just a shell. It dies in about 100 years, but the manomaya kaya (gandhabba) may live for thousands of years in the human bhava.
– A fly lives only a week or so, but that “fly bhava” (or the existence as a fly) may last many thousands or even millions of years.) So that fly lives in the gandhabba state too.
– As we have discussed, the gandhabba state is not there in Brahma and Deva realms. Their bhava and jati are literally the same. They are born once in those bhava.

[Lal]

TripleGemStudent asked: “Have I understood this correctly? At 39:57 of the video. The subtitle says the “Dukkhaskandha (the aggregate of suffering) is panchaskandha. Is that the same as saying the pancakkhandha is dukkha?

I have been contemplating on this recently and still am. “Is the Pancakkhandha dukkha?” The answer that I’m able to come up with, pancakkhandha “is” dukkha, but it’s not the cause of dukkha..”

Yes. You understood correctly.

– Pancakkhandha is dukkha.
– But one is still “engaged with pancakkhandha” because one had made causes for the current human body to ARISE via panca upadanakkhadha (i.e., craving for pancakkhandha) in previous lives.
– This current body is a RESULT. It will have to bear any suffering that comes with it (Ven. Moggallana was beaten to death, and even the Buddha had some ailments and an injury).

We need to ALWAYS think about suffering from INSIGHT/WISDOM, and NOT with FEELINGS.

The CAUSE of FUTURE suffering is panca upadanakkhadha.

P.S. In other words, what an average human perceives to be “pleasure” is actually the CAUSE of future suffering (only Noble Persons, who have comprehended Noble Turths/Paticca Samuppada/Tilakkhana, can see that).

[Lal]

I did not see Jay’s comment since he had replied to my post on April 28, 2020, above.

Jay wrote on December 3, 2020, above: “More importantly, all of the above, from Ajahn Samāhita’s talk, seems to align—remarkably closely!—with the concepts of gati, gandhabba, hadaya vatthu, and nāma-lōka presented in the various, related posts on those subjects here on this site..”

That is right. Venerable Bhikkhu Samāhita’s ideas, as I remember, are close to what I have discussed.

However, the only problem that I saw was the following. He seems to suggest that it all happens in the brain.
– Even though he mentions that the Tipitaka refers to concepts like gati, gandhabba, hadaya vatthu, he had not connected those with the manomaya kaya. He mostly talks about brain processes.
– If my impression is not correct, please let me know. I can re-listen to that discourse to refresh my memory.

[Lal]

Hello Jay,

Sorry that I missed your post.

1. Namaloka is the same as vinnana dhatu. I think you will understand it if you read all the posts in the following subsection. The post that you referred to is one in that subsection.

“Our Two Worlds – Rupa Loka and Nāma Loka”

2. I prefer to use the term “nama loka” rather than “vinnana dhatu” since it makes it simpler to understand.
– The rupakkhandha is associated with the rupa loka or the five dhatus: pathavi, apo, tejo, vayo, akasa.
– The four mental aggregates (vedanakkhandha, sannakkhandha, sankarakkhandha, vinnnakkhandha) are associated with the nama loka or vinnana dhatu.

3. If you have questions after reading that subsection, please don’t hesitate to ask questions.
– But please refer to the specific post and bullet numbers.

[Lal]

The link provided by Christian did not work. I have provided a valid link for the pdf.

That book was written by Dr. Chula Goonasekera.

He sent me a copy to proofread, and I did not have time to go through it. But I did make some suggestions on the spelling of Pali words.
– I see that he has not changed the spellings but has made a comment about it at the end of the Preface.
– The above is the final version that he sent me recently.

Sri Lankans spell Pali words in a unique way according to how the words are actually pronounced. Therefore, the Pali word “anicca” is written as “anichcha,” for example.
– See, “Tipitaka English” Convention Adopted by Early European Scholars – Part 1” and the second part referred to in there.

As I mentioned to the author, I did not have time to go through the booklet.
– But if anyone has questions, please refer to the relevant page number.
– If I cannot respond to a question, I can ask him to respond.

[Lal]

“I already know/see/understand that the panca upadanakhhanda CAUSES suffering, but I have been contemplating on to see if the pancakkhanda IS (not cause :)) suffering.”

That is a subtle point, It may depend on how one uses words to describe “meanings.”

The way I look at it is as follows.
– If there is a bottle of poison on the table, it is not going to hurt anyone.
– But if one drinks that, one will be subjected to suffering.

In the same way, pancakkhandha is like a bottle of poison.
– One will be subjected to suffering if one craves pancakkhandha, i.e., it is pancupadanakkhandha that leads to FUTURE suffering.

For example, an Arahant has removed part of suffering in this life. That is sankhara dukkha (an Arahant would not generate (abhi)sankhara, and thus “samphssa-ja-vadana” would not arise in an Arahant.
– However, dukkha vedana due to past kamma will still bring suffering until the death of the physical body.

[Lal]

The folowing post is from TripleGemStudent:

Key words Lal always says “future suffering” and “suffering in the rebirth process”. It sounds so simple, but it really has deep meanings, not easy to understand on a deep level at all . . .

Lal says:

“Craving for sense pleasures leads to future suffering.”

Seeing from the sankhara perspective, we do abhisankhara to chase these kama assada’s and we end up with jati’s (we’ll use a body for this example). In return, we end up having to do more sankhara to manage our bodies and if we chase kama assada’s while managing our body, we end up doing more abhisankhara. It’s like . . . abhisankhara —> sankhara —-> abhisankhara —–> sankhara . . . It’s like a vicious cycle -_-;;

After my last post, there was something that I realized, I apologize if some of you already know this or seem so simple. I thought I would share anyways because I didn’t realize it or were able to see it this way.

I believe that all sankhara is suffering because there’s always a mental/physical exertion/strain component to it. Living and learning/practicing the Buddha Dhamma, we’ll always need to do some form of sankhara. For instance, we need food, be able to breath, mental energy, etc . . . What I didn’t realize was that NOT being able to do sankhara to manage oneself when one has a body is dukkha as well !! It’s like I’m in dukkha either way. . .

Of course having attained Nibbana and not having to do any sankhara’s in the first place is the most ideal . . . But that’s not the case for all of us, since we’re all here right now . . .

Imagine for us not being able to do/carry out the necessary sankhara’s to learn/practice the Buddha Dhamma, that would be the greatest suffering. At anytime unexpected situations like illness, body pains, mundane affairs can interfere with our ability to learn/practice the Buddha Dhamma or even our ability to do the necessary sankhara’s to live a comfortable life. I have to do sankhara to live, learn/practice Buddha Dhamma, but if I can’t do the necessary sankhara’s to manage myself, learn/practice the Buddha Dhamma, I suffer too!!

Sabbe sankhara dukkha . . . Yup sounds about right . . .

I think I might have realized something as well . . . Anyone please feel free to share your thoughts/opinions… To me it seems like:

Sabbe sankhara annica
Sabbe sankhara dukkha
Sabbe dhamma anatta

and

Taṃ kiṃ maññatha, bhikkhave, rūpaṃ niccaṃ vā aniccaṃ vā”ti?

“Aniccaṃ, Bhante.”
“Yaṃ panāniccaṃ dukkhaṃ vā taṃ sukhaṃ vā”ti?

“Dukkhaṃ, Bhante.”

“Yaṃ panāniccaṃ dukkhaṃ vipari­ṇāma­dhammaṃ, kallaṃ nu taṃ samanupassituṃ: ‘etaṃ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti?

Is the same, but worded differently? If it’s the same, then would it be appropriate for me to substitute the word “sankhara” for rupa, vedana, sanna, vinnana? Like:

Sabbe rupa anicca
Sabbe rupa dukkha
Sabbe dhamma anatta

etc . . .

I already know/see/understand that the panca upadanakhhanda CAUSES suffering, but I have been contemplating on to see if the pancakkhanda IS (not cause :)) suffering. I think I might have my answer and be able to give the reasons for my answer. But I’ll save that for another post.

[Lal]

“Realization of dukkha through wisdom and not through the vedana citta’s”

That is exactly right.
– The Noble Truth of Suffering is NOT the dukkha vedana.
– The cause of those dukkha vedana is the craving for sensory pleasures (kama assada). That is the Noble Truth on suffering.
– To stop future suffering one must remove those cravings for sense pleasures. That is not easy to do. The first step is just to realize the truth of that statement. That understanding starts at the Sotapanna Anugami stage and is firmly established in the mind at the Sotapanna phala moment.
– Then the cravings for sense pleasures start to reduce at the Sakadagami stage and mostly go away only at the Anagami stage.

I will start a new series soon to explain that in yet a different way.

To put it in another way:
– An average human thinks that sense pleasures are good and one must seek them. Sankhara dukkha is mostly associated with such pursuits of sense pleasures.
– The Buddha taught that reality is the other way around. Craving for sense pleasures leads to future suffering.
– However, that craving CANNOT be removed by will power. The first step is to clearly SEE (and understand) why the Buddha said that. It is embedded in Paticca Samuppada. The series of steps that lead to suffering start with “avijja paccaya sankhara”. It is those (abhi)sankhara (done with avijja) that lead to future suffering.

[Lal]

Sotapanna Anugami wrote: “Dukkha dukha, tendency to change and suffer is taken from Venerable Waharakha Thero’s desana.”

– Waharaka Thero’s desanas are sometimes not translated correctly. The English translation can depend on the translator. I have emphasized that in the thread that has several of Waharaka desana translated. P.S. See my comment on June 13, 2020 at 6:58 am at “Waharaka Thero English Subs Discourse”
– That is why I translated one of them. But it takes too much time.
– So, I want to emphasize that SOME parts of the Waharaka desanas may not be correctly translated.

The three types of dukkha can be summarized as follows:
– Dukkha dukkha is mainly kamma vipaka that manifest in the physical body: injuries, sicknesses, body aches/pains, etc.
– Sankhara dukkha is the suffering associated with one’s efforts to acquire more sensory pleasures. One has to work hard to make a living and to acquire “things’ that we perceive to provide happiness.
– Those things that we acquire breakdown and break apart. Furthermore, our bodies also start degrading at old age and die. Both those lead to distress and that is the viparinama dukkha.

Those are the main ideas but can be described in more detail.
– See, for example, “Introduction – What is Suffering?“

[Lal]

“Buddha is referring to Arahanthood, but isn’t Uddhacca removed only at arahant stage?”

Yes. That is right.

“So does Abandoning the hindrances mean removing them completely then getting into Jhanas OR removing them by contemplating them in the next 4 Jhanas? ”

– Here is a key point to understand. There is a HUGE difference between mundane (anariya) jhanas and Ariya jhanas.
– Anariya jhanas attained via anariya techniques like breath meditation. Hidden defilements (anusaya) for raga, dosa, moha NOT removed by those techniques. Those defilements are merely SUPPRESSED.
– One gets to Ariya jhanas by removing layers of anusaya (at different levels) in successive jhanas. At the fourth jhana, one has removed even the avijja anusaya completely.
One must be at least an Anagami to GET TO the fourth jhana.
– One can attain the Arahant stage by cultivating the fourth jhana and then cultivating higher arupavacara jhanas, and then eventually getting to the highest arupavacara jhana and getting to nirodha samapatti. This is one way (step-by-step) to attain Arahanthod (cetovimutti)
– One can get to Arahanthood also via vipassana (insight meditation) from any of the Ariya or anariya jhana (or even with upacara samadhi, which is just below the first jhana). That is the other way of pannavimutti.

Each of us (and even any animal) had cultivated all anariya jhanas in our deep past.
– That is why getting attached to jhanic pleasures is NOT a good idea.

An Ariya (a Noble Person) automatically GETS Ariya jhanas when he/she cultivates the Path.
– One SHOULD NOT cultivate jhanas with the expectation of experiencing “jhanic pleasures.”
– An Ariya ALWAYS takes Nibbana (discarding worldly things) as the arammana or the main goal.
– If one takes a worldly object (such as breath or a kasina object) as the arammana, that WILL lead to an anariya jhana.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Jittananto

[Lal]

Sorry about the delay in replying. I am on travel and in a different time zone as well.

The sutta that you refer to require setting up the background. I think there was a discussion on this topic in an old thread here. But I don’t have time to look for it right now.

Let me give a brief outline.

King Yama is one of many “judges” in the nirayas. They are like our judges in a way.

People who have done clear-cut bad deeds automatically are born in the appropriate nirayas.
– However, when there are “borderline cases” that are sent to these “judges” like “King Yama”. Those judges interrogate such persons and make a determination whether they should be “saved” from the nirayas.

“messenger of the gods” referred to in the sutta refer to the advice from the Devas”.
– Devas always want humans to do good and be born among them.
– Those who don’t heed such advice engage in bad deeds and are unable to avoid births in the apayas.

That is essentially what is meant by “messenger of the gods” that King Yama referred to.

There are many things about this world that we are not aware of. It is not worthwhile to look into fine details.
– The Buddha described such scenarios to warn people about the price they will have to pay if they engage in immoral deeds.
– There are some graphic details about the sufferings (torture) in such nirayas in this and a few other suttas.

[Author]

Posts