Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
A satta is any living being without at least the Sotapanna Anugami stage of Nibbana.
- Sotapanna Anugami is the “lowest” of the eight Noble Persons (Ariyas). All Ariyas are guaranteed to attain Nibbana (Arahanthood) within seven bhava (existences.)
- Any other living being (including all Devas and Brahmas) belong to the “satta” category.
- That is explained in the “Satta Sutta (SN 23.2)” you quoted. I have linked to the exact place in the sutta: “Rūpe kho, rādha, yo chando yo rāgo yā nandī yā taṇhā, tatra satto, tatra visatto, tasmā sattoti vuccati” OR “Anyone who has cravings for sensory inputs (rupa) is a “satta.”
- In the strict sense, only an Arahant is not a “satta.” However, all other Ariyas are guaranteed to attain Arahanthood within seven bhava (existences). Thus, an Ariya is usually not included in the category of “satta.”
I discussed that sutta in “Five Aggregates and Tilakkhaṇa – Introduction” and “Aniccaṁ Vipariṇāmi Aññathābhāvi – A Critical Verse.”
- I am not quite sure whether that is what you tried to explain in your analogy.
There are several Radha Suttas.
- It would be helpful to provide a link or more specifications, such as SN 22.71, which is one of the Radha Suttas.
It seems to be a readjustment in the brain, allowing recalling different memory records.
- There is another well-documented account of Dorothy Eady, who started recalling her past life in Egypt thousands of years ago.
“Rebirth Account of Dorothy Eady“
2 users thanked author for this post.
Memories are in vinnana dhatu. The brain retrieves them.
- If the brain becomes defective, memory recall will be poor. Depending on the extent of the damage to the brain, memory recall can even stop, for example, for those with Alzheimer’s.
There are several posts on this subject. Following are only a few:
“Where Are Memories Stored? – Viññāṇa Dhātu“
“Brain – Interface between Mind and Body”
“Autobiographical Memory – Preserved in Nāma Loka.”
1 user thanked author for this post.
Yoniso mansikara has a deeper meaning than “wise attention” because “wise attention” could be taken in a mundane way. The question is: “What is wise?”
- See “Yoniso Manasikāra and Paṭicca Samuppāda“
- One needs to understand Paticca Samuppada to have “wise attention.”
1 user thanked author for this post.
That is interesting! They seem to convey at least the mundane meanings.
“We use Viparinamam if that “which has come to be” is a development or a change for the worse. “
- Yes. That is the correct meaning.
“In the example, the sitting position which I relied upon as comfortable, is now the very reason for my pain. It has become completely “other” or “the otherwise” (Annathabhava). Right from the start it was not something to be relied upon. To be craved for. I put my expectations and hopes on it, while it (without any heed to me and my hopes on it) became the other.”
- As I mentioned above, that is a mundane interpretation of “viparinama.” No posture can provide comfort for too long. It is said that even a Brahma (with no dense physical body like ours) cannot remain in the “same position” for too long.
The deeper meaning of “viparinama” is that pursuing any “rupa” with vedana, sanna, sankhara, or vinnana cannot lead to the “perfect state with no suffering” or “pabhassara mind” or Nibbana. That is the critical idea in the post “Vipariṇāma – Two Meanings.” There, “viparinama” means to move away from the “perfect state with no suffering.”
P.S. I edited the title of the thread.
I think it is close. It could be a little better as follows:
“As from a collection of flowers many a garland can be made by an expert florist, so also, many good deeds can be done (out of faith and generosity) by a person from birth to death.”
1 user thanked author for this post.
Thank you, Gad. That is an excellent account of Visākha’s life.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Paying taxes means paying one’s fair share to maintain the infrastructure (such as roads, the judicial system, etc.). That is more like “fulfilling one’s obligations.” (Of course, many governments spend carelessly, but that is a separate issue.)
- “Giving” is to those who do not have other means to sustain life. That includes bhikkhus and the poor. That is done with “good intentions” and going over and above one’s necessary obligations.
- “Giving” to the poor (and also animals) is out of compassion when seeing the suffering they go through. That generates “strong javana citta” with “good kammic energies.”
- “Giving” to bhikkhus and temples helps sustain the “Buddha Sasana” for future generations, and that is even more meritorious. Buddha’s teachings will not survive without temples and bhikkhus.
3 users thanked author for this post.
Yes. You do.
- The meaning of “kusala” is to avoid “akusala.” See “Kusala Sutta (AN 10.180).”
- Another aspect is to engage in “puñña kamma” or “moral deeds,” like giving. That is also essential to cultivating the path. See “Puñña Kamma – Dāna, Sīla, Bhāvanā.”
- Also see “Dasa Akusala/Dasa Kusala – Basis of Buddha Dhamma.”
This is an important point. Please feel free to ask questions/comment.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Yes. The trnslation of the verse:
“Muñca pure muñca pacchato,
Majjhe muñca bhavassa pāragū;
Sabbattha vimuttamānaso,
Na punaṁ jātijaraṁ upehisi.”
could be better as follows:
“Let go of the past, future, and present and transcend this existence and “be free of all suffering” (Sabbattha vimuttamānaso). With your mind wholly liberated (from the pancupadanakkhandha), you will be released from repeated (punaṁ) birth and death.”
- The point is that pancupadanakkhandha includes attachment to past and present experiences and any attachments arising at present. Once one has seen the unfruitfulness of craving anything in this world anywhere, why make more abhisankhara (“avijja paccaya sankhara“) and move away from Nibbana?
- We have been discussing this in recent posts, including today’s post. We need to move to the left on the chart in today’s post: “Vipariṇāma – Two Meanings.” Any abhisankhara generation in the purana or nava kamma stages moves a mind away from Nibbana.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Excellent. Thank you, Gad.
1 user thanked author for this post.
A couple of corrections:
“An anagami has only eliminated the desire for physical food (Kabalinkāhāra)”
- An Anāgāmi has removed the craving for all “close contact” with the physical body, i.e., tastes, smells, and touch (including sex). Any desire to enjoy sights and sounds associated with those is eliminated, too.
- Thus, kabaḷīkāra āhāra means craving those via all five physical senses (pañca kāma.) An Anāgāmi has removed them. I revised #4 of the post to include this.
“The Sakadagamin and Sotāpanna have these desires intact or weakened. However, they will never commit any akusala acts to enjoy these 4 types of food.”
- The correct statement is: “The Sakadagamis and Sotāpannas have these desires weakened. However, they will never commit any apayagami (i.e., can lead to rebirth in the apayas) akusala kamma to enjoy these four types of “mental food.”
“All beings below the arahant stage nourish their mind in one way or another, whether moral (the Ariyas and certain Puthujunas) or immoral (the majority of puthujunas) which will lead them to pleasant or unpleasant rebirths.”
- Usually, only the rebirths in the apayas are called “bad rebirths.” That is not possible for any Ariya, including Sotapanna Anugamis. Of course, the human realm (and even a few low-lying Deva realms) has significant suffering, too. Thus, we could say that anyone above the Anagami stage would be free of substantial suffering. Of course, death is ended only for Arahants.
1 user thanked author for this post.
