Lal

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,496 through 3,510 (of 4,246 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: habitual behaviour and suffering #20964
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Siebe: There is no point in making statements without backing up with Tipitaka evidence.

    If you want to make a case, please provide evidence. Otherwise, this discussion is not going anywhere.

    This website is filled with evidence that “a person” is nothing but a “set of gati”. Suffering arises because we all have “immoral gati”. Even though we also have “moral gati”, they do not lead to high-levels of suffering.

    However, when we get rid of “immoral gati”, one realizes that those “moral gati” also lead to births that are of unsatisfactory nature, and end up with suffering because one will encounter death eventually. Furthermore, upon death from that “good birth” one can and will be born with a “bad birth” filled with much suffering.

    Thus when one attains the Arahant stage, one gets rid of “all gati that have arisen due to abhisankhara”.

    But until that Arahant’s physical body dies, he/she will have some kammically neutral gati, as I explained in my previous post.

    Unless you can provide concrete evidence from the Tipitaka to backup your claims, please do not bother to make “statements”. That will only clutter this discussion board.

    in reply to: habitual behaviour and suffering #20939
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Siebe said: “Someone who uproots all those anusaya only becomes more him/herself.”

    That is contrary to all the teachings of the Buddha.

    One attains the Arahanthood when one uproots all anusaya. We need to remember that anusaya are the “hidden defilements (lobha, dosa, moha)” waiting to come to the surface when strong enough sense inputs are received.

    When one one uproots all anusaya one would have removed all gati (gathi) too.

    Then one (a living Arahant) would only have “kammically neutral gati” like specific ways one speaks, walks, eats, dresses, etc. etc.
    – When the physical body dies all gati would be gone.

    in reply to: Sammaparibbajaniya Sutta #20926
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Yes. It is a beautiful verse, y not.

    The sutta is about the merits that one receive due to punna kamma (good deeds) sooner or later. That comes from the whole sutta, even though the verse does not say it specifically.

    So, I think the meaning of the verse will be more clear this way:

    Human good fortune,
    delight in the world of the gods,
    even the ATTAINMENT of Nibbana,
    through this merit they receive from good deeds.

    in reply to: habitual behaviour and suffering #20921
    Lal
    Keymaster

    “Behaviour arises in two ways;
    -1. Habitually, conditionally arising, impulsive, not free
    -2. From emptiness, or ourselves, spontaneous, free.”

    How can behavior arise from emptiness? Thing do not “just happen”. There is always a cause(s).

    Behavior arising form ourselves is the same as 1 above.

    in reply to: habitual behaviour and suffering #20918
    Lal
    Keymaster

    “There comes a time when one also sees and really feels doing habitually good is not pure. One senses that it is not stainless, because anything habitual cannot be stainless, because all habitual behaviour is grounded in avijja.”

    You may want to explain why that is true.

    in reply to: Indriya bhavana/good deeds/ayatana #20913
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Thank you very much, upekkha100!

    I just revised both those posts to make necessary corrections.

    Please let me know any kind of mistakes. We want this site to be “error free” as much as possible. I do make mistakes (there could be some especially in older posts), and I would appreciate anyone pointing out any errors.

    in reply to: Anicca : "It’s Always the (Same) Sun" ? #20903
    Lal
    Keymaster

    OK. I see. You were talking about the changes in the “Sun”.

    I revised it back.

    in reply to: Indriya bhavana/good deeds/ayatana #20894
    Lal
    Keymaster

    I think the key is “ragakkhayo Nibbanam,dosakkhayo Nibbanam,mohakkhayo Nibbanam”.

    Nibbana is attained by eliminating greed, hate, and ignorance (of the Four Noble Truths) completely.

    When that happens, one would have cultivated ALL sobhana cetasika to the maximum. So, it is not correct to say that any sobhana cetasika (including metta, karuna, etc) would be eliminated.

    Sobhana cetasika also include alobha and adosa. amoha comes via the panna (wisdom) cetasika; see, “Cetasika (Mental Factors)“.

    What happens is the when panna is optimum, one not only sees the futility of staying in the rebirth process, but one’s sanna and citta will also be automatically adjusted to that.

    Then one’s mind will not grasp (upadana) any bhava at the cuti-patisandhi moment.

    If I have stated that alobha, adosa, amoha will also be removed at Nibbana, please let me know.

    in reply to: Anicca : "It’s Always the (Same) Sun" ? #20891
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Yeos: I assume you are talking about “San” and not “Sun”? I have changed “Sun” in the title of the topic to “San”.

    Here is the sub section on “san”: San

    in reply to: Indriya bhavana/good deeds/ayatana #20888
    Lal
    Keymaster

    “The intellectual understanding of the “why” it’s not difficult…
    but what is your understanding on the subject ?”

    I have understood the need to stop rebirth in all realms. I have no desire to be reborn anywhere in the 31 realms.

    But I have not yet removed the “sanna” or the perception of “asmi mana” or a “self”. This is a complex subject and that is all I am going to say on that.

    in reply to: Discourse 4 – Sakkaya Ditthi – What is “a Person”? #20886
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Nikita said: “So, if I get it right, that means that manomaya kaya of a bodybuilder does actually get bigger when he’s growing in size.”

    We cannot look at the gandhabba kaya (or the manomaya kaya) in the same way that we look at or perceive a physical body.
    – Gandhabba kaya is more like an energy field that can expand with the physical body.
    – When the gandhabba kaya comes out of a dead physical body and has to wait for another womb, it can grow in “density” by absorbing various odors. Then it can become somewhat like a “fine misty figure” that some humans can even see (or be captured in some photographs). I think that is how the concept of a “ghost” came about.
    – That “ghostly figure” resembles that of the previous human body. It may grow “hair” and “finger nails” (in fine form) with time and that is why they look scary. Even a normal human would look scary after a few years of not cutting hair and finger nails.

    in reply to: Indriya bhavana/good deeds/ayatana #20885
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Yeos said: “The above should be understood as kusala kamma not having any influence upon rebirth?”

    Yes. It does. Kusala kamma help one attain Nibbana, or stop the rebirth process, starting with rebirths in the four lowest realms at the Sotapanna stage.
    – Punna kamma help with that too, since they help one avoid rebirths in the apayas: “Kusala and Akusala Kamma, Punna and Pāpa Kamma“.

    Most of us cannot understand yet why one needs to stop rebirths in all realms. That does not need to be contemplated until one gets to the Anagami stage.

    in reply to: Indriya bhavana/good deeds/ayatana #20882
    Lal
    Keymaster

    upekkha100:

    “1) When one does punnabhisankhara, are the sense faculties ayatana here as well?”

    Yes. Punnabhisankhara also lead to rebirths. Even though they are in “good realms”, the rebirth process will continue. As long as one is in the rebirth process without attaining a magga phala, one is likely to be reborn in an apaya at some point.
    – Yes. In this case also indriya are used as ayatana.

    Another thing to keep mind is that punna kamma become kusala kamma if there is no greed or avijja associated with that act. The that would not count towards rebirth.
    – For example, if one donates something out of pure compassion, that is a kusala kamma. It could become just a punna kamma if there are “any expectations” for that giving.
    – In any case, one should definitely do such acts without worrying too much about that distinction. Getting rebirths in good realms is a must until one gets to a magga phala.

    Regarding indriya bhavana:
    You said: ‘But when we do good deeds, to eventually make these good deeds not be rooted in alobha/adosa/amoha.”

    Actually, when one’s understanding increases, one’s wisdom (panna) will grow. Then one would be AUTOMATICALLY doing most deeds with panna or with understanding of the anicca nature.
    – Then one would be doing more deeds with metta, karuna,mudita, upekkha.The higher the understanding, the more power those thoughts will have.
    – So, that is not something easy to force. It comes with understanding.

    You said: “Without good deeds, Nibbana will be difficult to attain.”
    Exactly right. One should NEVER shy away from punna kamma. As our understanding grows, those will automatically become kusala kamma. We don’t need to worry whether they are punna kamma or kusala kamma.

    in reply to: Discourse 2 – Icca, Nicca, Anicca #20881
    Lal
    Keymaster

    firewns:

    Kammic energy is defined at the beginning of a bhava. So, when it runs out one will leave the existing bhava regardless of which form it is in.

    So, if it runs out while in the gandhabba state, the gandhabba will cease to exist and the new life-form will start.
    – For example, if the new bhava is a deva bhava, then a deva will appear in the deva loka instantaneously.

    If the kammic energy runs out for a human baby, the baby will die and the new life-form will start.
    – For example, if the new bhava is an animal bhava, an animal gandhabba will come out of the dead body of that baby.
    – By the way, this why some healthy young people just drop and die. They could have been very healthy. But of course there will be a medical reason, for example, “an unexpected” heart attack could have been the cause.

    in reply to: Kalama Sutta: how to know what is true or false #20869
    Lal
    Keymaster

    Yes. I believe that translation is good.

    “are the English translations correct? Is this one of those suttas that is straightforward and sufficient as is? Or is there a deeper meaning behind the surface meaning? Does it need patiniddesa(need to be described in detail)?”

    Yes to the first two and no to the last two.

    It is not a deep sutta, but as you say it is an important sutta.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,496 through 3,510 (of 4,246 total)