Explaining differences among Sotapanna, Sakadagami’s etc. Lal said:
“Those are just differences in understanding of the true nature of this world (anicca, dukkha, anatta, asubha, rogata,etc, where the most important first three are called Tilakkhana)”.
Isn’t it true there is also a difference, yet, in understanding the unconditioned, Nibbana?
From a teacher i understood Nibbana may not be called nicca, sukha and atta as opposed to anicca, dukkha and anatta, because Nibbana cannot be described in a conventional way, or by using conventional terms.
What do you think?
Siebe