March 21, 2022; revised June 20, 2023
IdappaccayÄtÄ Paį¹icca SamuppÄda starts with an Ärammaį¹a or a sensory input.
Numerous Changes of Mindset in a Day
1. Think about how often our “mood” or “mindest” changes during even an hour.
- Consider person X eating a meal and experiencing a good mindset; he enjoyed the food. That mindset arose due to an Ärammaį¹a, the taste of the food.
- Suppose X saw a long hair on the plate halfway through the meal. For some people like X, that new Ärammaį¹a of “seeing the hair on the plate” is enough to ruin the meal and get into an angry mindset. Suppose X was eating at a restaurant, and he called the waiter and angrily complained.
- The waiter apologized and promised to bring X a fresh meal. Soon as X heard that, he again became happy. X finished his meal and came out of the restaurant with a happy and content mindset.
- While walking, X saw one of his worst enemies, Y. The sight of Y brought in a new “strong Ärammaį¹a” and changed X’s mood again. He started thinking about the problems that the person had caused, and he got angrier by the minute.
2. As you see, our mindset and thoughts change rapidly. The examples that we discussed above can be explained via IdappaccayÄtÄ Paį¹icca SamuppÄda, which we discussed in the previous post: “IdappaccayatÄ Paį¹icca SamuppÄda ā Bhava and JÄti Within a Lifetime.”
- Each mindset discussed above resulted from a new Ärammaį¹a coming through one of the six senses.
- In chronological order, those mindsets were triggered by tasting food (jivhÄ viƱƱÄį¹a), seeing the hair (cakkhu viƱƱÄį¹a), waiter sayingĀ that he will get a fresh serving (sota viƱƱÄį¹a), and seeing Y (cakkhu viƱƱÄį¹a).
- All those triggers were vipÄka viƱƱÄį¹aĀ or different types of “consciousness.”Ā They happened to be that way. The meal could have been not tasty; if you didn’t see the hair, that would have prevented you from getting into an angry mindset, etc.
PÄli Word for “Mindset” Is “Bhavaį¹ ga“
3. The word “bhavaį¹ga” comes from “bhava” + “aį¹ga” where “bhava” means “existence” and“aį¹ga” means “part of.” Thus, “bhavaį¹ga” means “part of existence at that time,” which is the “mindset at that time.”
- There is also a “natural bhavaį¹ga”Ā that we are born with. If the mind is not focused on a “strong Ärammaį¹a,” the mind falls back to that “natural bhavaį¹ga.” Thus, we can say that our mind is in the “natural bhavaį¹ga”Ā state while we sleep.
- However, once we wake up and start getting bombarded with all kinds of Ärammaį¹a coming through the six senses, our “mindset” or “temporary bhavaį¹ga” can change many times a day, as we saw above.
- I will be using “mindset” and “temporary bhavaį¹ga” interchangeably so that you will get used to the meaning.
- Now you can start seeing the difference between Upapatti PS and IdappaccayÄtÄ PS. In the former, “bhava” refers to “human existence,” while in the latter, “temporary bhava” is the mindset (or existence) lasting a relatively short time.
Only “Strong Ärammaį¹a” Can Bring in a “Temporary Bhavaį¹ga“
4. During the day, we get bombarded with an uncountable number of Ärammaį¹a, i.e., sensory inputs comping through the six senses. Yet, we don’t pay attention to most of them, i.e., they are “weak Ärammaį¹a” and not strong enough to “grab our attention.” In such cases, there is no change in the “bhavaį¹ga”Ā or “mindset.”
- So, what kind of Ärammaį¹a “grabs our attention” and changes the “bhavaį¹ga” state?
- That would be one we “really like,” “really dislike,” or “something unusual or something we cannot understand.” In the latter case, we could get into a “confused state of mind.” A “strong Ärammaį¹a” is usually associated with “lobha,” “dosa,” and “moha.”
- Let us examine the examples in #1 to clarify.
5. Taste of food was a “strong Ärammaį¹a” that changed the mindset from the “natural bhavaį¹ga” state to a good “temporary bhavaį¹ga” state. Here, the Ärammaį¹a was associated with lobha (attachment via liking.)
- Then another “strong Ärammaį¹a”Ā of “seeing the hair” flipped the mindset to an angry “temporary bhavaį¹ga” state. That Ärammaį¹a was associated with dosaĀ (attachment via dislike.)
- Hearing the waiter promising to bring a new meal was a new “strong Ärammaį¹a” made a good “temporary bhavaį¹ga” again. That Ärammaį¹a was associated with lobhaĀ (attachment via liking.)
- Seeing Y on the road was enough for X to get into a bad state of mind (with dosa) again.
6. To summarize: Our minds usually are in the “natural bhavaį¹ga”Ā state that comes with human existence. It can change to a different “temporary bhavaį¹ga”Ā by a ‘strong Ärammaį¹a.” Depending on how strong that Ärammaį¹a is, the “temporary bhavaį¹ga” can stay for minutes to hours to many days.
- Ā In the examples discussed above, “temporary bhavaį¹ga”Ā states lasted only for short times, less than an hour. In the Abhidhamma language, such Ärammaį¹a are categorized as “mahantÄrammaį¹a” (“mahanta + Ärammaį¹a” or “strong Ärammaį¹a.”)
- However, a very strong Ärammaį¹a can keep that “temporary bhavaį¹ga”Ā state for many days. For example, upon hearing the death of a parent, one may get into a “sad mindset” that can last even weeks. They are “very strong Ärammaį¹a” orĀ “atimahantÄrammaį¹a” (“ati + mahanta + Ärammaį¹a”.)
How Does an Ärammaį¹a Change the Mindset (Bhavaį¹ga)?
7. It is CRITICALLY important to understand how the mindset (temporary bhavaį¹ga) changes due to an Ärammaį¹a.
- As we discussed, a new Ärammaį¹a comes via a new sensory input coming through the six senses. Thus, it is one of the following: cakkhu, sota, ghÄna, jivhÄ, kÄya, or mano viƱƱÄį¹a. They are ALL vipÄka viƱƱÄį¹a. They provide sensory input. We see, hear, taste, smell, touch, or recall a memory. That, by itself, cannot change our mindset.
- For example, an Arahant will also see attractive things or taste a delicious meal. But no matter how delicious that meal is, it will NOT change the mindset of an Arahant.
- But the person in our example in #1 above got “attached” to the tasty meal. That is normal for an average human, and so are the other “mood swings” that the person went through in #1. But it is essential to understand how each of those swings in the mindset took place.
8. Delicious taste from the meal was a vipÄka viƱƱÄį¹a, specifically a jivhÄ viƱƱÄį¹a. The pleasant taste experienced was a natural vipÄka vedanÄ associated with that vipÄka viƱƱÄį¹a.Ā If an Arahant had eaten the same meal, he would have experienced its delicious taste. But what happens immediately after taking the first few bites would be very different for X and the Arahant.
- X got attached to the taste of the meal. In the Dhamma language, he started generating vaci abhisaį¹ khÄra that naturally would arise for an average human. He started thinking about how delicious the meal was AND how he might return to the restaurant for the same meal. Those thoughts were lobha-based (i.e., greedy) vaci abhisaį¹ khÄra. They were a strong version of saį¹ khÄra, i.e.,Ā abhisaį¹ khÄra. Thus, they arose via “avijjÄ paccayÄ abhisaį¹ khÄra” in IdappaccayÄtÄ Paį¹icca SamuppÄda.
- That immediately led to the second effect of “deciding to return to the restaurant in the future to have the same meal.” That expectation is a kamma viƱƱÄį¹a. That kamma viƱƱÄį¹a or the “expectation” was the result of abhisaį¹ khÄra, i.e., “(abhi)saį¹ khÄra paccayÄ viƱƱÄį¹a.”
9. Those abhisaį¹ khÄra and kamma viƱƱÄį¹a arose in powerful javana citta that ran through X’s mind while he was enjoying the meal. His mindset (temporary bhavaį¹ga) also changed to a “happy state.”
- So, here is the time sequence: (i) experience of a delicious taste (vipÄka viƱƱÄį¹a), (ii) arising of “happy but greedy thoughts” or vaci abhisaį¹ khÄra in javana citta, (iii) arising of a future expectation of having the same meal (creation of a kamma viƱƱÄį¹a), and (iv) registration of that experience as a “temporary bhavaį¹ga” state.
- Note: Javana cittÄĀ are a special type of citta that makes a kamma viƱƱÄį¹a more than just “consciousness.” AĀ kamma viƱƱÄį¹aĀ has an expectation/desire. Abhisaį¹ khÄra (with strong feelings) arise in javana citta and make javana citta become kamma viƱƱÄį¹a.
- As we know, vipÄka viƱƱÄį¹aĀ are of six types: cakkhu, sota, ghÄna, jivhÄ, kÄya, and mano viƱƱÄį¹a.
- On the other hand, kamma viƱƱÄį¹aĀ are ALWAYS mano viƱƱÄį¹a. We create kamma viƱƱÄį¹aĀ with javana citta.Ā Such kamma viƱƱÄį¹a arises via “(abhi)saį¹ khÄra paccayÄĀ viƱƱÄį¹a” in any type ofĀ Paį¹icca SamuppÄda.
No Change in Mindset (and No Javana Citta) in an Arahant
10. Now, let us see what would happen to Arahant if he had the same meal.
- The Arahant would have tasted the meal to be delicious too. Thus, the vipÄka viƱƱÄį¹a (jivhÄ viƱƱÄį¹a) was the same.
- But since an Arahant would not generate any lobha, dosa, or moha thoughts, vaci abhisaį¹ khÄra that arose in X will not occur in the Arahant. Thus, such a powerful javana citta would not have arisen in the Arahant.
- Thus, the Arahant will not generate any future expectation to taste it again, i.e., no kamma viƱƱÄį¹a.Ā
- Furthermore, the Arahant would not generate a “happy mindset” or “temporary bhavaį¹ga” state.Ā An Arahant will always have a neutral mindset.
11. Thus, abhisaį¹ khÄra in javana citta, establishing a new expectation (kamma viƱƱÄį¹a), and change in the bhavaį¹ga (mindset) will occur ONLY IF one attaches to a strong Ärammaį¹a.
- Those are the drastic differences between X and an ArahantĀ eating the same meal.
- The following posts discuss why such javana citta with lobha, dosa, and moha would not arise in an Arahant: “Paį¹icca SamuppÄda During a Lifetime.”
- It is critical to realize that an Arahant does not need to control the arising of such defiled thoughts. It happens automatically. The root causes for arising of such thoughts had been removed from the mind of Arahant.