I feel I’m quite open to others teachings and interpretations of the dhamma and can benefit from what others may say, but it doesn’t necessary mean I will take in other’s teachings and interpretations easily without some form of discernment. I looked into some of the links and discussions on Ven. Buddhaparayana teachings that was shared / provided and one of the comments that caught my attention was from this discussion:
teaching of ven. buddhaparayana 31 planes of existence and 32 marks of the Buddha! Dhammawheel
I can’t verify / confirmed the comments made by others on Ven. Buddhaparayana teachings or what was said since I don’t know Sinhalanese and the comments was based on a Sinhalanese video. But a comment that caught my attention was someone saying Ven. Buddhaparayana said that the Buddha did not talk about the four stages of sainthood and a comment that was most surprising to me and would be interested in hearing the explanation to as how the tilakkhana is not part of the Buddha teachings, “he also mentioned that Anicca, dukkha and anatta as three units also not a part of Buddha’s teaching.”
We need an explanation for that. I don’t want to assume, but there are plenty of “monks” talking their “ideas” in an extreme way to grab attention, and you can see the effect even here. What he said (if it’s true) is impossible because those teachings can be realized and experienced.