Reply To: A Different Way to Count the Jhānās?

#54246
Zapper
Participant

Nice, so you agree that there are only 4 jhānās.

But I didn’t get why you said it’s incorrect to say the thing that you quoted from my comment.

Don’t we both agree that the states above 4th jhānā should not be called jhānās?

Also, I am aware that the ninth one is not a jhānā, I was just saying that some people call it 9th jhānā.