Also, look at pācittiya 9:
‘If a monk tells a person who is not fully ordained about another monk’s serious offense, except if the monks have agreed, he commits an offense entailing confession.’”
“Yo pana bhikkhu bhikkhussa duṭṭhullaṃ āpattiṃ anupasampannassa āroceyya, aññatra bhikkhusammutiyā, pācittiyan”ti.
Anupasampannassa here, is unlikely to render as “not attained”, but “not ordained” fit well, right?
With Metta