Lal:
This is not easy for me .
Which one of the dasa akusala is it then when one has removed miccha ditthi and still has strong attachment to some one without greed or lust and with Metta there as well? Is it to say that even when the love is pure it is an akusala?
A satopanna or Sakadagami has removed miccha ditthi but still has kama, so Johnny’s ‘How can this person who still has attachment for his loved ones liberate himself from Kama Loka? Bonds of kinship are harder than metal ones.’, is granted, but if one has removed the first three samyojanas, one would still be tied to the Kama Loka, but to those realms above the human one. Do I get this right? (Johnny is still right in his overall statement).
This leads into more questions, but I am finding it hard to formulate them and , at any rate, I would not need to put them if I have got it all wrong even so far.
y not