Reply To: Is Nibbāna Anatta?

#49482
gopinadh
Participant

Sir, thanks a lot. I went through the lesson(posts) indicated by you.

I submit, to request to, dwell further deeper. 

In the said  post  “anuloma-khanti-sammattaniyama-pre-requisites-for-a-sotapanna/” the word Dhamma is explained  (within the scope of the post) as referring to “sankhata Dhamma”:  the relevant content is at point 6 which i have copied below:

“Dhammā (with a long-a) are the seeds that result when saṅkhāra are cultivated. “Dhammā” means to “bear things in this world.” But anything thus generated will not lead to a “nicca outcome,” and all those efforts are fruitless. Thus, all “dhammā” generated are of “anatta nature.”

Under Abhidhamma,  Nibbana or Nirvana, is classified as an Asankhata Dhamma.(the only one)

With this as the background, i beg to again ask , that in the  Dhammapada Verse 279, the word “Sabbe” is used , which if applied to the first level catogerization of Dhamma, would imply both Sankhata and Asankhata Dhamma. How should we then understand it? 

Thats my doubt sir.  The Meaning of Anatta is not being asked/questioned .

Regards Sir. I request  , to help me to learn more (correctly) on this issue.