In the #14, the table shows us that sotapanna removed all vipallasa of anicca and anatta. But he/she still have sanna and citta vipallasa of dukkha.
I guess if one has removed all of vipallasa of something, that means he/she have no more thing to improve of that.
In #1 said,
“For example, the concept of anicca is understood gradually — with a glimpse of it grasped on the way to the Sotāpanna stage, getting a firm foothold at the Sotāpanna stage, strengthening at the Sakadāgāmi and Anāgāmi stages — and is fully comprehended at the Arahant stage.”
So, aren’t these statements a kind of inconsistency?