Hi Akan, Ynot and Siebe,
Thank you for all your explanations, I appreciate all what you say, but what I can’t understand is that if Devas have such mild imperfections, why should we refer to them and say may I be able to develop the characteristics of Devas as ” stated in Devathanussathi bhavana?
Could it be another area of contradictions that would have happened during the time of translation of the original work? Or, have I read / interpreted something incorrectly?
A Quest to Recover Buddha's True Teachings