Is it correct to think of pañcupādānakkhandhā in the following way:
pañcupādānakkhandhā is pañcakkhandha such that:
vedanākkhandha comprises samphassa ja vedanā,
saññākkhandha comprises avijja, or saññā of nicca, sukha, atta,
saṅkhārakkhandha comprises abhisaṅkhāra,
and viññāṇakkhandha comprises kamma viññāṇa.
Thank you,
Lang