Lal said:
“Nibbana is the ultimate solution. Buddha Dhamma is the ultimate truth in this world.”
^Yes, this makes much more sense. I agree with it.
So does this mean anatta’s definition of “does not hold any ultimate truth” could be said differently as “does not hold any ultimate happiness/ultimate solution”. The latter definition would make much more sense to me personally, and would not contradict with the idea that Buddha Dhamma is the ultimate truth that can be found in this world.